Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145180›Full record

ReviewPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2023

The Context of Elder Maltreatment: an Opportunity for Prevention Science.

Cory Bolkan, Pamela B Teaster, Holly Ramsey-Klawsnik

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Potential for Prevention Science in Middle and Late Adulthood: a Commentary on the Special Issue of Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cory BolkanWashington State University, Vancouver, USA. bolkan@wsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-9155
Pamela B TeasterVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA.
Holly Ramsey-Klawsnik, Klawsnik & Klawsnik Associates, Canton, USA.
KLE University · INVirginia Tech · USWashington State University Vancouver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elder maltreatment (EM) has been understood as a worldwide major public health threat for decades, yet it remains a form of victimization receiving limited attention, resources, and research. EM, which includes caregiver neglect and self-neglect, has far-reaching and long-lasting impacts on older adults, their families, and communities. Rigorous prevention and intervention research has significantly lagged in proportion to the magnitude of this problem. With rapidly growing population aging, the coming decade will be transformative: by 2030, one in six people worldwide will be aged 60 or older, and approximately 16% will experience at least one form of maltreatment (World Health Organization, 2021). The goal of this paper is to raise awareness of the context and complexities of EM, provide an overview of current intervention strategies based on a scoping review, and discuss opportunities for further prevention research, practice, and policy within an ecological model applicable to EM.

Indexed as

Elder AbuseAgedCaregiversHumansElder abuse and neglectElder maltreatmentInterventionViolence prevention

Identifiers

PMID37145180
PMCPMC10161185
OpenAlexW4372332078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.