Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145130›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

Effects on hemodynamic enhancement and discomfort of a new textile electrode integrated in a sock during calf neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

C Sundström, R Juthberg, J Flodin, L Guo, N-K Persson, P W Ackermann

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Performance comparison of conductive textile electrodes in ECG monitoring.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C Sundström *Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
R Juthberg *Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J FlodinDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
L GuoPolymeric E- Textiles and Smart Textiles University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
N-K PerssonPolymeric E- Textiles and Smart Textiles University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
P W AckermannDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. paul.ackermann@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-169X
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Borås · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

VINNOVA 2019-05479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare fixed transverse textile electrodes (TTE) knitted into a sock versus motor point placed standard gel electrodes (MPE) on peak venous velocity (PVV) and discomfort, during calf neuromuscular electrical stimulation (calf-NMES).

methodsTen healthy participants received calf-NMES with increasing intensity until plantar flexion (measurement level I = ML I), and an additional mean 4 mA intensity (ML II), utilizing TTE and MPE. PVV was measured with Doppler ultrasound in the popliteal and femoral veins at baseline, ML I and II. Discomfort was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10). Significance was set to p < 0.05.

resultsTTE and MPE both induced significant increases in PVV from baseline to ML I and significantly higher increases to ML II, in both the popliteal and femoral veins (all p < 0.001). The popliteal increases of PVV from baseline to both ML I and II were significantly higher with TTE versus MPE (p < 0.05). The femoral increases of PVV from baseline to both ML I and II were not significantly different between TTE and MPE. TTE versus MPE resulted at ML I in higher mA and NRS (p < 0.001), and at ML II in higher mA (p = 0.005) while NRS was not significantly different.

conclusionTTE integrated in a sock produces intensity-dependent increases of popliteal and femoral hemodynamics comparable to MPE, but results in more discomfort at plantar flexion due to higher current required. TTE exhibits in the popliteal vein higher increases of PVV compared to MPE.

trial registrationTrial_ID: ISRCTN49260430. Date: 11/01/2022. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsLegElectric StimulationHumansPopliteal VeinUltrasonographyElectric stimulation therapyHemodynamicsMotor pointNMESPainTextile electrodes

Identifiers

PMID37145130
PMCPMC10460736
OpenAlexW4372294692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.