ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1986
Dual excitatory actions of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction in the guinea-pig vas deferens.
Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adrenergic and purinergic cotransmission in nicotine-evoked vasoconstriction in rabbit ileocolic arteries.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The action of acetylcholine (ACh) on the smooth muscle of guinea-pig vas deferens was studied using the sucrose-gap method. ACh, when applied at a concentration of 10(-6) M, evoked a depolarization of the smooth muscle membrane which was slow in time course (slow depolarization). When ACh was applied at higher concentrations, another depolarization which was fast in time course (fast depolarization) occurred, overlapping the early part of the slow depolarization. The magnitudes of both depolarizations were concentration-dependent on ACh. TTX and adrenergic receptor antagonists had little effect on either depolarizations, while guanethidine and nicotinic receptor antagonists mainly suppressed the fast depolarization. In contrast, atropine suppressed the slow depolarization. The membrane conductance observed by current application, was reduced during the slow depolarization, and the reversal potential of the depolarization was 18.3 mV negative to the resting membrane potential. Whereas, the reversal potential of the fast depolarization was 27.6 mV positive to the resting membrane potential. This reversal potential was quite similar to that of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-induced depolarization, previously observed in the same tissue. From these observations, it is suggested that in the guinea-pig vas deferens, ACh acts on nicotinic receptors at the sympathetic postganglionic nerve terminal, causing the release mostly of a non-adrenergic transmitter, probably ATP. In addition, ACh also acts on muscarinic receptors on the smooth muscle membrane, inducing membrane depolarization resulting from a reduction of the membrane conductance to potassium ions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.