Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37144401›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2023

Food security definition, measures and advocacy priorities in high-income countries: a Delphi consensus study.

Danielle Gallegos, Sue Booth, Christina Mary Pollard, Mariana Chilton, Sue Kleve

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. National Data on the Prevalence of Food Insecurity in Australia: Implications for Health Promotion.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Food inequity and insecurity and MASLD: burden, challenges, and interventions.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A design thinking-led approach to develop a responsive feeding intervention for Australian families vulnerable to food insecurity: Eat, Learn, Grow.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle GallegosSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-1909
Sue BoothCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Christina Mary PollardSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4261-4601
Mariana ChiltonDornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sue KleveDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-0357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish an international consensus on the definition of food security, measures and advocacy priorities in high-income countries.

designA two-round online Delphi survey with closing in March 2020 and December 2021. Consensus was set a priori at 75 %. Qualitative data were synthesised and priorities were ranked.

settingHigh-income countries.

participantsHousehold food security experts in academia, government and non-government organisations who had published in the last 5 years.

resultsUp to thirty-two participants from fourteen high-income countries responded to the Delphi with a 25 % response rate in Round 1 and a 38 % response rate in Round 2. Consensus was reached on the technical food security definition and its dimensions. Consensus was not reached on a definition suitable for the general public. All participants agreed that food security monitoring systems provide valuable data for in-country decision-making. Favoured interventions were those that focused on upstream social policy influencing income. Respondents agreed that both national and local community level strategies were required to ameliorate food insecurity, reinforcing the complexity of the problem.

conclusionsThis study furthers the conceptual understanding of the commonly used definition of food security and its constituent dimensions. Strong advocacy is needed to ensure food security monitoring, policy and mitigation strategies are implemented. The consensus on the importance of prioritising actions that address the underlying determinants of household food security by experts in the field from across wealthy nations provides evidence to focus advocacy efforts and generate public debate.

Indexed as

IncomePublic PolicyDelphi TechniqueDeveloped CountriesFood SecurityHumansDelphi surveyFood insecurityInterventionsMonitoring

Identifiers

PMID37144401
PMCPMC10564592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.