ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2023
LC
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Research on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in burn patients].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- [Development of an LC-MS/MS method for 32 steroid hormones and exploration of their gestational variations].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics in Clinical Diagnosis of Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma: A Review (2012-2024).Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2025Review
- Outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infection: interplay between bacteria, host, and healthcare system organization.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- The roles and patterns of critical care pharmacists: a literature review and practical operation model in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Simultaneous Quantification of Seven Antifungal Agents in Human Serum Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empirically prescribed standard dosing regimens of antibacterial agents may result in insufficient or excess plasma concentrations with persistently poor clinical outcomes, especially for patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antibacterial agents can guide dose adjustments to benefit patients. In this study, we developed a robust, sensitive, and simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) platform for the quantification of 14 antibacterial and antifungal agents (beta-lactams piperacillin, cefoperazone, and meropenem; beta-lactamase inhibitors tazobactam and sulbactam; antifungal agents fluconazole, caspofungin, posaconazole, and voriconazole; and daptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and tigecycline) that can be used for patients with severe infection. This assay requires only 100 µL of serum with rapid protein precipitation. Chromatographic analysis was performed using a Waters Acquity UPLC C8 column. Three stable isotope-labeled antibacterial agents and one analogue were used as internal standards. Calibration curves ranged from 0.1-100 μg/mL, 0.1-50 μg/mL, and 0.3-100 μg/mL for different drugs, and all correlation coefficients were greater than 0.9085. Intra- and inter-day imprecision and inaccuracy values were below 15%. After validation, this new method was successfully employed for TDM in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.