Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37144131›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2023

Unclasping potentials of genomics and gene editing in chickpea to fight climate change and global hunger threat.

Charul Singh, Ramesh Kumar, Hansa Sehgal, Sharmista Bhati, Tripti Singhal, Gayacharan, M S Nimmy, Renu Yadav, Santosh Kumar Gupta, Naglaa A Abdallah and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An overview of heat stress in Chickpea (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genetics, genomics, and breeding of black gram [Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Charul SinghUSBT, Guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, India.
Ramesh KumarDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Allahabad Prayagraj, Prayagraj, India.
Hansa SehgalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences, Pilani, India.
Sharmista BhatiSchool of Biotechnology, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, India.
Tripti SinghalDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
GayacharanDivision of Germplasm Evaluation, ICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India.
M S NimmyICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Renu YadavAIOA, Amity University, Noida, India.
Santosh Kumar GuptaDBT-National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Naglaa A AbdallahFaculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Aladdin HamwiehThe International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Cairo, Egypt.
Rajendra KumarDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
University of Allahabad · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INSaaz Genetics (India) · INAmity University · INCairo University · EGGautam Buddha University · INGuru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INNational Institute of Plant Genome Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomics and genome editing promise enormous opportunities for crop improvement and elementary research. Precise modification in the specific targeted location of a genome has profited over the unplanned insertional events which are generally accomplished employing unadventurous means of genetic modifications. The advent of new genome editing procedures viz; zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), homing endonucleases, transcription activator like effector nucleases (TALENs), Base Editors (BEs), and Primer Editors (PEs) enable molecular scientists to modulate gene expressions or create novel genes with high precision and efficiency. However, all these techniques are exorbitant and tedious since their prerequisites are difficult processes that necessitate protein engineering. Contrary to first generation genome modifying methods, CRISPR/Cas9 is simple to construct, and clones can hypothetically target several locations in the genome with different guide RNAs. Following the model of the application in crop with the help of the CRISPR/Cas9 module, various customized Cas9 cassettes have been cast off to advance mark discrimination and diminish random cuts. The present study discusses the progression in genome editing apparatuses, and their applications in chickpea crop development, scientific limitations, and future perspectives for biofortifying cytokinin dehydrogenase, nitrate reductase, superoxide dismutase to induce drought resistance, heat tolerance and higher yield in chickpea to encounter global climate change, hunger and nutritional threats.

Indexed as

chickpea improvementclimate changeCRISPR/Cas-9genome editinghunger threatTALENszinc finger nuclease

Identifiers

PMID37144131
PMCPMC10153629
OpenAlexW4366290956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.