Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143955›Full record

ArticleBurns & trauma2023

A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial.

Ignace De Decker, Henk Hoeksema, Jozef Verbelen, Petra De Coninck, Marijn Speeckaert, Sofie De Schepper, Phillip Blondeel, Ali Pirayesh, Stan Monstrey, Karel E Y Claes

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns & trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01033604 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Application of a Novel Dermal Substitute Based on Glycerol Preserved Allograft: GLYADERM

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2007 to 2012Enrolled31ConditionsFull Thickness Skin DefectsArmsGlyaderm and split skin graft, Split skin graft alone.
NCT06249971 nacompletednot on this map

A Single-stage Bilayered Skin Reconstruction Using Glyaderm® as an Acellular Dermal Regeneration Template Results in Improved Scar Quality: an Intra-individual Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2017 to 2021Enrolled82ConditionsBurns, Full Thickness Burn, Necrotizing FascitisArmsDermal subsitute Glyaderm + skin graft, Skin graft alone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of dermal substitutes in burns and burn scar reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  2. Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ignace De DeckerBurn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Henk HoeksemaBurn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Jozef VerbelenBurn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Petra De ConinckBurn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Marijn SpeeckaertDepartment of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie De SchepperDepartment of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Phillip BlondeelBurn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ali PirayeshPlastic surgeon in private practice in Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stan MonstreyBurn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Karel E Y ClaesBurn Center, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Absence of almost the entire reticular dermal layer is inherent to the use of autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) to close full-thickness wounds, often resulting in hypertrophic scars and contractures. Many dermal substitutes have been developed, but unfortunately most have varying results in terms of cosmetic and/or functional improvement as well as patient satisfaction, in addition to high costs. Bilayered skin reconstruction using the human-derived glycerolized acellular dermis (Glyaderm®) has been reported to result in significantly improved scar quality using a two-step procedure. Unlike the necessary two-step procedure for most commercially available dermal substitutes, in this study we aimed to investigate the use of Glyaderm® in a more cost-effective single-stage engrafting. This is a method which, if autografts are available, is preferred by the majority of surgeons given the reduction in costs, hospitalization time and infection rate. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled, intra-individual, single-blinded study was performed, investigating the simultaneous application of Glyaderm® and STSG Results: A total of 66 patients representing 82 wound comparisons were included. Graft take (>95%), pain management and healing time were comparable in both groups. At 1 year follow-up, the overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale assessed by the patient was significantly in favour of sites where Glyaderm® was used. Not infrequently, patients attributed this difference to improved skin sensation. Histological analysis showed the presence of a well-formed neodermis, with donor elastin present for up to 12 months. Conclusions: A single-stage bilayered reconstruction with Glyaderm® and STSG results in optimal graft take without loss of Glyaderm® nor the overlaying autografts due to infection. The presence of elastin in the neodermis was demonstrated during long-term follow-up in all but one patient, which is a crucial factor contributing to the significantly improved overall scar quality as evaluated by the blinded patients. Trial registration: The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov and received the following registration code: NCT01033604.

Indexed as

BurnDermal regeneration templateDermal substituteElastinGlyaderm®ScarSkin

Identifiers

PMID37143955
PMCPMC10152996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.