ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023
Illustrating How to Use the Validated Alsayed_v1 Tools to Improve Medical Care: A Particular Reference to the Global Initiative for Asthma 2022 Recommendations.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Medical Care Strategies for Primary Hypertension in Iraqi Adults: A Hospital-Based Problem-Oriented Plan.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Knowledge and Practice of Healthcare Professionals in the Medical Care of Asthma Adult Patients in Jordan with a Particular Reference to Adherence to GINA Recommendations.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Etiologies of Acute Bronchiolitis in Children at Risk for Asthma, with Emphasis on the Human Rhinovirus Genotyping Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The current research aimed to illustrate a real case using the validated Alsayed_v1 tools as tutorial training to improve the knowledge and skills of healthcare practitioners in the clinical problem-solving process necessary to implement medical and pharmaceutical care. Patients and Methods: The Alsayed_v1 instruments consist of principal components: data collection, assessment of treatments, the medical problem oriented plan (MPOP), as well as a care plan and patient education. Results: This study illustrated a real case of asthma patient using the validated Alsayed_v1 tools. These validated and clinically tested tools provide a coding system for the MPOP that permits easy documentation with an open hierarchical structure where higher levels are broad and lower levels are particular, and the possibility to enter free text. The section dedicated to treatment assessments is intended to synthesize patient information to facilitate the identification of the MPOPs. Effective management requires the development of a partnership between the patient with asthma (or the patient's caregivers) and his healthcare professional(s). This partnership aims to allow the patient to control his condition with guidance from the healthcare professional(s), discuss and agree on therapy goals, and develop a personalized, written, self-management asthma care plan. Conclusion: By implementing Alsayed_v1 tools, the clinical practitioner can actively give the best practice for optimal patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.