Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143846›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia using the Pneumonia Severity Index

Anna G Kaal, Linde Op de Hoek, Davinia T Hochheimer, Corline Brouwers, W Joost Wiersinga, Dominic Snijders, Katrijn L Rensing, Christel E van Dijk, Ewout W Steyerberg, Cees van Nieuwkoop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna G KaalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-3515
Linde Op de HoekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Davinia T HochheimerThe National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Corline BrouwersThe National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.
W Joost WiersingaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Dept. of Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dominic SnijdersDepartment of Pulmonology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Katrijn L RensingThe National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Christel E van DijkThe National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cees van NieuwkoopDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0734-0844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and the CURB-65 score assess disease severity in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We compared the clinical performance of both prognostic scores according to clinical outcomes and admission rates. Methods: A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted using claims data from adult CAP patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) in 2018 and 2019. Dutch hospitals were divided into three categories: "CURB-65 hospitals" (n=25), "PSI hospitals" (n=19) and hospitals using both ("no-consensus hospitals", n=15). Main outcomes were hospital admission rates, intensive care unit admissions, length of hospital stay, delayed admissions, readmissions and all-cause 30-day mortality. Multilevel logistic and Poisson regression analysis were used to adjust for potential confounders. Findings: Of 50 984 included CAP patients, 21 157 were treated in CURB-65 hospitals, 17 279 in PSI hospitals and 12 548 in no-consensus hospitals. The 30-day mortality was significantly lower in CURB-65 hospitals Interpretation: In this study, using the CURB-65 in CAP patients at the ED is associated with similar and possibly even better clinical outcomes compared to using the PSI. After confirmation in prospective studies, the CURB-65 may be recommended over the use of the PSI since it is associated with lower 30-day mortality and is more user-friendly.

Identifiers

PMID37143846
PMCPMC10152258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.