Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143644›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Curious Case Report: Should a Clinician Be Worried About Bone Resorption Under a Chin Augmentation Site?

Kavya Shankar Muttanahally, Aditya Tadinada

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kavya Shankar MuttanahallyOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, USA.
Aditya TadinadaOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA.
UConn Health · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oftentimes patients are concerned about their facial esthetics and appearance. To achieve the desired look, patients have several augmentation procedures available to them. Appearance of the chin and its morphology plays a crucial role in facial aesthetics. It is an important anatomic component that not only helps in the definition of the jawline and face but is also required from a functional aspect. It is not uncommon in the field of plastic surgery for patients to undergo chin reconstruction and recontouring due to the chin deformities such as microgenia and jaw asymmetry. The treatment options mainly depend on the degree of the defect and the desired functional and esthetic requirements. Along with surgical augmentations like implants and osseous genioplasty, soft tissue augmentations like injectables are also gaining popularity. These procedures can lead to complications like many other augmentation procedures. If proper follow-up is not done on these patients, the complications can cause potential damage to vital structures in the vicinity. This case report shows a patient who underwent a chin augmentation procedure with a silastic implant and never had a follow-up and is now at risk of severe resorption of the underlying bone.

Indexed as

chin augmentationchin deformitycone-beam computed tomography (cbct)microgeniasilastic implant

Identifiers

PMID37143644
PMCPMC10154005
OpenAlexW4362510143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.