ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023
Validation of the Chinese Cultural Tightness-Looseness Scale and General Tightness-Looseness Scale.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to revise the Cultural Tightness-Looseness Scale (CTLS) and General Tightness-Looseness Scale (GTLS), and explore the group heterogeneity of tightness-looseness perception in Chinese populations. Methods: Sample 1 ( Results: The revised CTLS contained four items and retained a single-dimensional structure. The revised GTLS consisted of eight items divided into two dimensions: Compliance with Norms and Social Sanctions. Latent profile analysis extracted two profiles on both CTLS and GTLS scores, indicating that the sample can be divided into two subgroups: high and low perception of tightness. Discussion: The Chinese versions of the CTLS and GTLS can be used as valid and reliable measures of tightness-looseness perception in a Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.