Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143483›Full record

ArticleJournal of nematology2023

18S-NemaBase: Curated 18S rRNA Database of Nematode Sequences.

Kaitlin Gattoni, Eli M S Gendron, Rebeca Sandoval-Ruiz, Abigail Borgemeier, J Parr McQueen, Rachel M Shepherd, Dieter Slos, Thomas O Powers, Dorota L Porazinska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nematode Community Profiling in Organic and Conventional Spinach Systems.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of nematology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kaitlin GattoniDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, FL 32611 United States of America.
Eli M S GendronDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, FL 32611 United States of America.
Rebeca Sandoval-RuizDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, FL 32611 United States of America.
Abigail BorgemeierDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68588 United States of America.
J Parr McQueenDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, FL 32611 United States of America.
Rachel M ShepherdDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, FL 32611 United States of America.
Dieter SlosPlant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 96, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Thomas O PowersDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68588 United States of America.
Dorota L PorazinskaDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, FL 32611 United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nematodes are the most abundant and diverse animals on the planet but lack representation in biodiversity research. This presents a problem for studying nematode diversity, particularly when molecular tools (i.e., barcoding and metabarcoding) rely on well-populated and curated reference databases, which are absent for nematodes. To improve molecular identification and the assessment of nematode diversity, we created and curated an 18S rRNA database specific to nematodes (18S-NemaBase) using sequences sourced from the most recent publicly available 18S rRNA SILVA v138 database. As part of the curation process, taxonomic strings were standardized to contain a fixed number of taxonomic ranks relevant to nematology and updated for the most recent accepted nematode classifications. In addition, apparent erroneous sequences were removed. To test the efficacy and accuracy of 18S-NemaBase, we compared it to an older but also curated SILVA v111 and the newest SILVA v138 by assigning taxonomies and analyzing the diversity of a nematode dataset from the Western Nebraska Sandhills. We showed that 18S-NemaBase provided more accurate taxonomic assignments and diversity assessments than either version of SILVA, with a much easier workflow and no need for manual corrections. Additionally, observed diversity further improved when 18S-NemaBase was supplemented with reference sequences from nematodes present in the study site. Although the 18S-NemaBase is a step in the right direction, a concerted effort to increase the number of high-quality, accessible, full-length nematode reference sequences is more important now than ever.

Indexed as

biodiversitydatabaseecologymetabarcodingnematodes

Identifiers

PMID37143483
PMCPMC10152464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.