Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143402›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2023

Bone-to-Bone Ligament Preserving Laminoplasty with Ultrasonic Osteotome Assistance for Intraspinal Tumors: A Technical Note and Clinical Follow-Up.

Hongtao Rong, Sipeng Li, Ruiguang Zhang, Bowen Zheng, Yuhang Diao, Tao Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Comparative study on effectiveness between laminoplasty with unilateral spinous process-ligament complex preservation and traditional laminoplasty for thoracolumbar intraspinal tumors].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongtao RongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Sipeng LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ruiguang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bowen ZhengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yuhang DiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tao ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-535X
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

Tianjin Municipal Health Commission ZC20175Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau NO. 19ZXDBSY00040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaminectomy has been widely used for intraspinal tumor resection. However, the tilted spinous process and narrow lateral laminae of the thoracic spine along with the hypertrophic ligamentum flavum of the lumbar spine pose certain problems for the laminae removal of the traditional laminectomy. We improved the laminectomy method with ultrasonic osteotome to treat thoracolumbar tumors and assessed its safety and superiority.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed in 86 patients with thoracolumbar (T4-L5) spinal tumors treated by resection, including 44 with the lamina removed using the traditional method and 42 with the lamina removed using the bone-to-bone ligament preserving (BLP) laminoplasty, which preserves the posterior ligament complex. Age, sex, and tumor size, location, and depth were compared between the two groups. The length of incision and bone window, time to remove the vertebral lamina, and epidural effusion volume were recorded at 2 weeks after surgery in the two groups. Postoperative reexamination by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery was compared with preoperative MRI to assess the change in vertebral lamina displacement.

resultsThere were no statistical differences in age, sex, and tumor size, depth, or location between the two groups. The BLP laminectomy did not increase the risk of dural, spinal cord, or nerve injuries. The difference between the incision and tumor length, as well as the difference between the bone window and tumor length in the BLP laminectomy group, were smaller than those in the traditional laminectomy group, and the BLP laminectomy took less time compared to that of the traditional laminectomy (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the volume of epidural effusion between the two groups at 2 weeks postoperatively, or in the displacement of the returned vertebral plate observed in sagittal and axial positions. The same was true for the displacement at 3 months postoperatively in the axial position. However, the sagittal displacement in the BLP laminectomy group was smaller than that in the traditional laminectomy group (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe BLP laminectomy is safe for the resection of thoracolumbar spinal canal tumors. It is less traumatic and faster, with less displacement of the returned lamina, resulting in a stable repair of the spine.

Indexed as

LaminoplastySpinal NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaminectomyLigamentsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonicsBone-To-Bone Ligament Preserving (BLP) LaminoplastySafetySuperiorityThoracolumbar Spinal TumorsUltrasonic Osteotome-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID37143402
PMCPMC10235164
OpenAlexW4372332692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.