Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143148›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2023

Utility of eConsults for COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns in Ontario: a cross-sectional analysis.

Graham Walter, Samira Jeimy, Clare Liddy, Sheena Guglani, Anne K Ellis, Amy Blair, Hazar Kobayaa, Zave Chad, Erin Keely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Graham WalterDepartment of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. umwalteg@myumanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-1271
Samira JeimyDepartment of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Clare LiddyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sheena GuglaniC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Anne K EllisDivision of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Amy BlairDivision of Pediatric Clinical Immunology & Allergy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hazar KobayaaDandelion Allergy Centre, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Zave ChadDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Erin KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

INSPIRE-PHC INSPIRE-PHCOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Champlain BASE™ and Ontario eConsult services are virtual platforms that serve to facilitate contact between primary care providers and specialists across Ontario, relaying patient-specific questions to relevant specialists via a secure web-based platform. Despite ample evidence regarding the general effectiveness of these platforms, their utility as it pertains to clinical concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines has not yet been explored.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of COVID-19 vaccine related eConsults on Ontario patients completed by five allergy specialists between February and October of 2021. 4318 COVID-19 vaccine-related eConsults were completed in total during this time; with 1857 completed by the five allergists participating in this analysis. Question types/content were categorized using a taxonomy developed through consensus on a weighted monthly sample of 499 total cases. Data regarding whether external resources were required to answer each eConsult, impact on primary care provider referral decisions, and allergy consultant response times were collected. A 2-question survey was completed by primary care providers following eConsultation and results were collected.

results41.08% of eConsults received involved safety concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine administration in the setting of prior allergic disease and another 36.1% involved a potential reaction the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. 72.1% of eConsults were answered by specialist without needing external resources, and only 9.8% of all eConsults received resulted in a recommendation for formal in-person referral to Clinical Immunology & Allergy specialist or another subspecialty. Average time to complete eConsult was 16.4 min, and 79.7% of PCP eConsult queries which would have traditionally resulted in formal consultation were resolved based on advice provided in the eConsult without need for in-person assessment.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates the utility of the eConsult service as it pertains to COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns. The eConsult platform proved an effective tool in diverting the need for in-person assessment by an Allergist or other medical specialty. This is significant given the large volume of eConsults completed by Allergists, and demonstrates the impact of an effective electronic delivery of care model during a time of strained resources and public health efforts directed at mass vaccination.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19eConsultVirtual Health Care

Identifiers

PMID37143148
PMCPMC10158700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.