Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143071›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Evaluation of the implementation progress through key performance indicators in a new multimorbidity patient-centered care model in Chile.

Teresita Varela, Paula Zamorano, Paulina Muñoz, Carolina Rain, Esteban Irazoqui, Jaime C Sapag, Alvaro Tellez

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teresita VarelaCentro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Paula ZamoranoCentro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. pfzamorano@uc.cl.
Paulina MuñozCentro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Carolina RainDepartment of Family Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Esteban IrazoquiCentro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Jaime C SapagDepartment of Family Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Alvaro TellezCentro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex health interventions involve deep organizational, structural, and cultural changes that challenge health teams and decision-makers. The explosion of chronic diseases has made the multimorbidity approach a global priority. The Centro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC implemented a Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in the Chilean public health system.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the progress of the implementation of the Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in seven primary care centers through key performance indicators.

methodsa set of indicators was designed to evaluate change management, operations, installation of new roles, and services and activities of the intervention strategy of the model. Key performance indicators were identified to monitor the implementation progress on minimal components for the model's sustainability. Each item was assigned against an expected minimum score of 67% of progress from the overall score. They were monitored twice in seven primary health centers in 2019 and 2020, which intervened 22,642 patients with the intervention.

resultsThe results showed that six of the seven primary care centers reached the minimum implementation threshold. The main advances were in operational conditions, and those with minor progress in implementation were the clinical services. Population size, organization, coordination of the health care teams, additional training, and decision-makers support were key factors that determined the degree of progress in a complex intervention.

conclusionIt was possible to measure the progression of the implementation of a complex intervention through key performance indicators delivering relevant information for decision-makers that pursue a successful and faithful implementation. This study provides a valuable tool for the national scale-up of a similar model started in Chile by the Ministry of Health and other countries.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPatient-Centered CareChileChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansImplementationKey performance indicatorsModelMultimorbidityPatient-centeredProgress

Identifiers

PMID37143071
PMCPMC10159678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.