Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37143056›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

The Marri Gudjaga project: a study protocol for a randomised control trial using Aboriginal peer support workers to promote breastfeeding of Aboriginal babies.

Rebecca Thorne, Rowena Ivers, Michelle Dickson, Karen Charlton, Lisa Jackson Pulver, Christine Catling, Michael Dibley, Simon Eckermann, Shahla Meedya, Miranda Buck and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rebecca ThorneUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. beck@uow.edu.au.
Rowena IversUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Michelle DicksonUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Karen CharltonUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Lisa Jackson PulverUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Christine CatlingUniversity of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Michael DibleyUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Simon EckermannUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Shahla MeedyaUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Miranda BuckLatrobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Patrick KellyUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Elizabeth BestNSW Ministry of Health, NSW, Australia.
Melanie BriggsWaminda - South Coast Women's Health & Welfare Aboriginal Corporation, Nowra, Australia.
Joan TanianeNSW Ministry of Health, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastfeeding protects against a range of conditions in the infant, including sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), diarrhoea, respiratory infections and middle ear infections [1, 2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding until six months of age, with continued breastfeeding recommended for at least two years and other complementary nutritious foods [3]. The 2017-18 National Health Survey (NHS) and 2018-19 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey (NATSIHS) reported that the proportion of breastfeeding in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander infants (0-2 years) were less than half that of non-Indigenous infants (21.2% vs. 45%, respectively)[4]. There is a lack of research on interventions supporting Aboriginal women to breastfeed, identifying an evaluation gap related to peer support interventions to encourage exclusive breastfeeding in Aboriginal women.

methodsWe will evaluate the effect of scheduled breastfeeding peer support for and by Aboriginal women, on breastfeeding initiation and the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding. This MRFF (Medical Research Future Fund) funded project is designed as a single-blinded cluster randomised controlled trial recruiting six sites across New South Wales, Australia, with three sites being randomised to employ a peer support worker or undertaking standard care. Forty pregnant women will be recruited each year from each of the six sites and will be surveyed during pregnancy, at six weeks, four and six months postnatally with a single text message at 12 months to ascertain breastfeeding rates. In-depth interviews via an Indigenous style of conversation and storytelling called 'Yarning' will be completed at pre- and post-intervention with five randomly recruited community members and five health professionals at each site" [5]. Yarns will be audio recorded, transcribed, coded and thematic analysis undertaken. Health economic analysis will be completed to assess the health system incremental cost and effects of the breastfeeding intervention relative to usual care. DISCUSSION: Evidence will be given on the effectiveness of Aboriginal peer support workers to promote the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding of Aboriginal babies. The findings of this study will provide evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of including peer support workers in postnatal care to promote breastfeeding practices.

trial registrationACTRN12622001208796 The impact of breastfeeding peer support on nutrition of Aboriginal infants.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingHealth Services, IndigenousAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesChild, PreschoolFemaleForecastingHumansIndigenous PeoplesInfantPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAboriginalBreastfeedingBreastfeeding initiationPeer support

Identifiers

PMID37143056
PMCPMC10161673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.