Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142971›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Effect of remimazolam versus propofol for the induction of general anesthesia on cerebral blood flow and oxygen saturation in elderly patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Jianling Gao, Chengdi Yang, Qiuyuan Ji, Jian Li

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Evaluating Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation.Current neuropharmacology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Safety of Remimazolam in Vulnerable Populations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianling Gao *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chengdi Yang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qiuyuan Ji *Department of Anesthesiology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jian LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. kentleesz@suda.edu.cn.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted to investigate the effects and safety of remimazolam versus propofol on cerebral oxygen saturation and cerebral hemodynamics during the induction of general anesthesia in patients receiving carotid endarterectomy (CEA), so as to provide theoretical basis for better clinical application of remimazolam.

methodsForty-three patients (60-75 years old) with carotid artery stenosis (carotid artery stenosis greater than 70%) were randomly divided into the remimazolam group (R group) and the propofol group (P group). Anesthesia was induced with remimazolam (0.3 mg/kg) or propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg) individually. At time of admission (T0), post-anesthesia induction (T1), consciousness disappears (T2), 1 min after loss of consciousness (T3), 2 min after loss of consciousness (T4) and pre-endotracheal intubation (T5), measurement in patients with regional cerebral oxygen saturation (SrO

resultsSrO

conclusionsOur study revealed that remimazolam can be administered safely and effectively during the induction of general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy in elder population and it demonstrated superiority in hemodynamic changes compared with propofol. CLINICAL

trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300070370. Date of registration: April 11, 2023.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidPropofolAgedAnesthesia, GeneralBenzodiazepinesCerebrovascular CirculationHumansMiddle AgedOxygen SaturationUnconsciousnessBenzodiazepinesPropofolremimazolamAnesthesia inductionCarotid endarterectomyCerebral oxygen saturationPropofolRemimazolam

Identifiers

PMID37142971
PMCPMC10157955
OpenAlexW4372335816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.