Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142959›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2023

Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in women aged ≥ 69 referred to colposcopy due to an HPV-positive screening test.

Berit B Booth, Mette Tranberg, Line W Gustafson, Anne G Christiansen, Helle Lapirtis, Lisa M Krogh, Ina Marie D Hjorth, Anne Hammer

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cervical cancer screening strategies in women 65 years and older in the human papillomavirus era: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human papillomavirus-based testing and self-sampling approaches.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Berit B Booth *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NIDO - Centre for Research and Education, Gødstrup Hospital, Hospitalsparken 15, Herning, 7400, Denmark. berit.booth@auh.rm.dk.
Mette Tranberg *University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Line W GustafsonUniversity Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Anne G ChristiansenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NIDO - Centre for Research and Education, Gødstrup Hospital, Hospitalsparken 15, Herning, 7400, Denmark.
Helle LapirtisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Lisa M KroghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Ina Marie D HjorthDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark.
Anne HammerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NIDO - Centre for Research and Education, Gødstrup Hospital, Hospitalsparken 15, Herning, 7400, Denmark.
Regional Hospital Randers · DKAarhus University · DKEducation Training And Research · USRegional Hospital Horsens · DKRegionshospitalet Viborg · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are high in older women in many developed countries, including Denmark. Therefore, Danish women aged 69 and older were invited for one additional human papilloma virus (HPV) based screening test in 2017. Here, we describe the clinical management and detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +) in screen-positive women referred for colposcopy.

methodsWe conducted an observational study in public gynecology departments in Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Women were eligible for enrolment if they were aged 69 + in 2017, HPV positive on a screening test taken between April 20

resultsA total of 191 women were included with a median age of 74 years (IQR: 71-78). Most women (74.9%) did not have a fully visible transformation zone at colposcopy. At the first visit 170 women (89.0%) had a histological sample collected, 34 of whom (20.0%, 95% CI 14.3-26.8%) had CIN2 + diagnosed, 19 had CIN3 + , and two had cervical cancer). During follow-up additional CIN2 + were detected resulting in a total of 42 women (24.4%, 95% CI: 18.2-31.5%) being diagnosed with CIN2 + , 25 with CIN3 + , and three with cervical cancer. When restricting to women with paired histologic results (i.e., biopsies and a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimen), we found that CIN2 + was missed in 17.9% (95% CI 8.9-30.4%) of biopsies compared to the LEEP.

conclusionOur findings suggest a potential risk of underdiagnosis in older postmenopausal women referred to colposcopy. Future studies should explore potential risk-markers for discrimination of women at increased risk of CIN2 + from those at low risk, as this would reduce risk of underdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyColposcopyFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaePregnancyCervical cancer screeningCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaColposcopyHuman papillomavirusLoop electrosurgical excision procedurePostmenopausal women

Identifiers

PMID37142959
PMCPMC10161414
OpenAlexW4368617784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.