Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142941›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Optimized Method of 3D Scaffold Seeding, Cell Cultivation, and Monitoring Cell Status for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Adrian Krolinski, Kai Sommer, Johanna Wiesner, Oliver Friedrich, Martin Vielreicher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian KrolinskiInstitute of Medical Biotechnology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Kai SommerInstitute of Medical Biotechnology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Johanna WiesnerInstitute of Medical Biotechnology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Oliver FriedrichInstitute of Medical Biotechnology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Martin VielreicherInstitute of Medical Biotechnology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. martin.vielreicher@mbt.uni-erlangen.de.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cultivation of cells in 3D systems is commonly regarded to be more physiological than in 2D as it comes much closer to the natural situation in tissues in many different aspects. However, 3D cell culture is much more complex. Cells within the pores of a printed 3D scaffold face a special situation concerning cell-material interaction and cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and supply of medium and oxygen into the core of the scaffolds. Biological assays (for cell proliferation, viability, and activity) have been validated primarily for 2D cell cultures and need to be adapted for 3D cultures. Likewise, in imaging, a number of points need to be taken into account in order to get a clear picture of the cells in 3D scaffolds, preferably with the method of multiphoton microscopy. Here, we describe a method for pretreatment and cell seeding of porous inorganic composite scaffolds (α-TCP/HA) for bone tissue engineering and for cultivation of the cell-scaffold constructs. The analytical methods described are the cell proliferation assay and the ALP activity assay. A step-by-step protocol is provided here that safely tackles typical difficulties that arise with this 3D cell-scaffold setting. In addition, MPM imaging of cells is described both with and without labeling. The combination of biochemical assays and imaging provides valuable insights into the possibilities of analysis with this 3D cell-scaffold system.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBone and BonesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationOsteogenesisPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D scaffoldsCell adhesionCell proliferationCell seedingCollagen-I formationMultiphoton imagingOsteogenic differentiationQuantitative assaysScaffold populationSecond harmonic generation (SHG)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.