ArticleMolecular diversity2024
Classification of FLT3 inhibitors and SAR analysis by machine learning methods.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrated approach for novel PTP1B inhibitor screening: combining machine learning models, molecular docking, molecular and dynamics simulations.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Machine Learning in Medicinal Chemistry: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
- A Simple Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model for Predicting pICPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is a type III receptor tyrosine kinase, which is an important target for anti-cancer therapy. In this work, we conducted a structure-activity relationship (SAR) study on 3867 FLT3 inhibitors we collected. MACCS fingerprints, ECFP4 fingerprints, and TT fingerprints were used to represent the inhibitors in the dataset. A total of 36 classification models were built based on support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and deep neural networks (DNN) algorithms. Model 3D_3 built by deep neural networks (DNN) and TT fingerprints performed best on the test set with the highest prediction accuracy of 85.83% and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.72 and also performed well on the external test set. In addition, we clustered 3867 inhibitors into 11 subsets by the K-Means algorithm to figure out the structural characteristics of the reported FLT3 inhibitors. Finally, we analyzed the SAR of FLT3 inhibitors by RF algorithm based on ECFP4 fingerprints. The results showed that 2-aminopyrimidine, 1-ethylpiperidine,2,4-bis(methylamino)pyrimidine, amino-aromatic heterocycle, [(2E)-but-2-enyl]dimethylamine, but-2-enyl, and alkynyl were typical fragments among highly active inhibitors. Besides, three scaffolds in Subset_A (Subset 4), Subset_B, and Subset_C showed a significant relationship to inhibition activity targeting FLT3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37142889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.