Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142875›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2023

Features and Long-Term Outcomes of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Achieving Complete Response Under Anti-PD-1-Based Immunotherapy.

Eftychia Chatziioannou, Ulrike Leiter, Ioannis Thomas, Ulrike Keim, Olivia Seeber, Andreas Meiwes, Isabell Boessenecker, Stephanie Sanchez Gonzalez, Francisco Merraz Torres, Heike Niessner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eftychia ChatziioannouCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-7160
Ulrike LeiterCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ioannis ThomasCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ulrike KeimCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Olivia SeeberCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Andreas MeiwesCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Isabell BoesseneckerCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Stephanie Sanchez GonzalezCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Francisco Merraz TorresCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Heike NiessnerCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tobias SinnbergCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Andrea ForschnerCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Lukas FlatzCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Teresa AmaralCenter for Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstrasse 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. teresa.amaral@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-5181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has changed the melanoma treatment spectrum. Few studies have examined the characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients achieving complete response (CR) under ICI. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe evaluated patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma treated with first-line ICI. The characteristics of those achieving CR were compared with those not achieving CR. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Late-onset toxicities, response to second-line treatment, the prognostic value of clinicopathologic features, and blood markers were examined.

resultsA total of 265 patients were included; 41 (15.5%) achieved CR, while 224 (84.5%) had progressive disease, stable disease, or partial response. At the therapy start, those who had CR were more likely to be older than 65 years of age (p = 0.013), have a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio below 213 (p = 0.036), and have lower lactate dehydrogenase levels (p = 0.008) than those not achieving a CR. For those who discontinued therapy after CR, the median follow-up time after CR was 56 months (interquartile range [IQR] 52-58) and the median time from CR to therapy end was 10 months (IQR 1-17). Five-year PFS after CR was 79% and 5-year OS was 83%. Most complete responders had a normalization of S100 at the time of CR (p < 0.001). In simple Cox regression analysis, age below 77 years at CR (p = 0.04) was associated with better prognosis after CR. Eight patients received second-line ICI; disease control was seen in 63%. Late immune-related toxicities occurred in 25% of patients, most being cutaneous immune-related toxicities.

conclusionsResponse, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, is, until now, the most important prognostic factor, and CR is a valid surrogate marker for long-term survival in patients treated with ICI. Our results highlight the importance of investigating the optimal therapy duration in complete responders.

Indexed as

MelanomaAgedHumansImmunotherapyPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRemission InductionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37142875
PMCPMC10195722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.