Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142781›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2023

Modulation of H-reflex and V-wave responses during dynamic balance perturbations.

Samuli Nevanperä, Nijia Hu, Simon Walker, Janne Avela, Jarmo M Piirainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuli NevanperäSports Technology Program, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Kidekuja 2, 88610, Vuokatti, Finland. samuli.m.nevanpera@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5502-7492
Nijia HuNeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Rautpohjankatu 8, PL35, 40700, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Simon WalkerNeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Rautpohjankatu 8, PL35, 40700, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Janne AvelaNeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Rautpohjankatu 8, PL35, 40700, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Jarmo M PiirainenSports Technology Program, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Kidekuja 2, 88610, Vuokatti, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motoneuron excitability is possible to measure using H-reflex and V-wave responses. However, it is not known how the motor control is organized, how the H-reflex and V-wave responses modulate and how repeatable these are during dynamic balance perturbations. To assess the repeatability, 16 participants (8 men, 8 women) went through two, identical measurement sessions with ~ 48 h intervals, where maximal isometric plantar flexion (IMVC) and dynamic balance perturbations in horizontal, anterior-posterior direction were performed. Soleus muscle (SOL) neural modulation during balance perturbations were measured at 40, 70, 100 and 130 ms after ankle movement by using both H-reflex and V-wave methods. V-wave, which depicts the magnitude of efferent motoneuronal output (Bergmann et al. in JAMA 8:e77705, 2013), was significantly enhanced as early as 70 ms after the ankle movement. Both the ratio of M-wave-normalized V-wave (0.022-0.076, p < 0.001) and H-reflex (0.386-0.523, p < 0.001) increased significantly at the latency of 70 ms compared to the latency of 40 ms and remained at these levels at latter latencies. In addition, M-wave normalized V-wave/H-reflex ratio increased from 0.056 to 0.179 (p < 0.001). The repeatability of V-wave demonstrated moderate-to-substantial repeatability (ICC = 0.774-0.912) whereas the H-reflex was more variable showing fair-to-substantial repeatability (ICC = 0.581-0.855). As a conclusion, V-wave was enhanced already at 70 ms after the perturbation, which may indicate that increased activation of motoneurons occurred due to changes in descending drive. Since this is a short time-period for voluntary activity, some other, potentially subcortical responses might be involved for V-wave increment rather than voluntary drive. Our results addressed the usability and repeatability of V-wave method during dynamic conditions, which can be utilized in future studies.

Indexed as

H-ReflexMuscle, SkeletalElectromyographyFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionDynamic balanceDynamic conditionH-reflexNeural modulationV-wave

Identifiers

PMID37142781
PMCPMC10224810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.