Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Diagnosis of thyroid micronodules on ultrasound using a deep convolutional neural network.

Miribi Rho, Sei Hyun Chun, Eunjung Lee, Hye Sun Lee, Jung Hyun Yoon, Vivian Youngjean Park, Kyunghwa Han, Jin Young Kwak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miribi RhoDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sei Hyun ChunDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eunjung LeeSchool of Mathematics and Computing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Hye Sun LeeBiostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Hyun YoonDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Vivian Youngjean ParkDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyunghwa HanDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Young KwakDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. docjin@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KRSeverance Hospital · KRYonsei University Health System · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the performance of deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to discriminate malignant and benign thyroid nodules < 10 mm in size and compare the diagnostic performance of CNN with those of radiologists. Computer-aided diagnosis was implemented with CNN and trained using ultrasound (US) images of 13,560 nodules ≥ 10 mm in size. Between March 2016 and February 2018, US images of nodules < 10 mm were retrospectively collected at the same institution. All nodules were confirmed as malignant or benign from aspirate cytology or surgical histology. Diagnostic performances of CNN and radiologists were assessed and compared for area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Subgroup analyses were performed based on nodule size with a cut-off value of 5 mm. Categorization performances of CNN and radiologists were also compared. A total of 370 nodules from 362 consecutive patients were assessed. CNN showed higher negative predictive value (35.3% vs. 22.6%, P = 0.048) and AUC (0.66 vs. 0.57, P = 0.04) than radiologists. CNN also showed better categorization performance than radiologists. In the subgroup of nodules ≤ 5 mm, CNN showed higher AUC (0.63 vs. 0.51, P = 0.08) and specificity (68.2% vs. 9.1%, P < 0.001) than radiologists. Convolutional neural network trained with thyroid nodules ≥ 10 mm in size showed overall better diagnostic performance than radiologists in the diagnosis and categorization of thyroid nodules < 10 mm, especially in nodules ≤ 5 mm.

Indexed as

Thyroid NoduleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37142760
PMCPMC10160046
OpenAlexW4372337600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.