Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142731›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2023

Chemoradiotherapy versus triplet chemotherapy as initial therapy for T4b esophageal cancer: survival results from a multicenter randomized Phase 2 trial.

Makoto Yamasaki, Hiroshi Miyata, Kotaro Yamashita, Takuya Hamakawa, Koji Tanaka, Keijiro Sugimura, Tomoki Makino, Atsushi Takeno, Osamu Shiraishi, Masaaki Motoori and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Conversion surgery for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Makoto YamasakiDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan. yamasakm@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.
Hiroshi MiyataDepartment of Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Kotaro YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya HamakawaDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Koji TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Keijiro SugimuraDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Tomoki MakinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-4217
Atsushi TakenoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Osamu ShiraishiDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, Japan.
Masaaki MotooriDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8529-2844
Yutaka KimuraDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-0586
Motohiro HiraoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazumasa FujitaniDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Takusi YasudaDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiko YanoDepartment of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report the long-term results as primary endpoint in a multicentre randomized prospective Phase 2 trial which compared chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and triplet chemotherapy (CT) as the initial therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in T4b esophageal cancer (EC).

methodsPatients with T4b EC were randomly assigned to the CRT group or CT group as initial treatment. CS was performed if resectable after initial or secondary treatment. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival, analysed by intention-to-treat.

resultsThe median follow-up period was 43.8 months. The 2-year survival rate was higher in the CRT group (55.1%; 95% CI: 41.1-68.3%) compared to the CT group (34.7%; 95% CI: 22.8-48.9%), although the difference was not significant (P = 0.11). Local and regional lymph node recurrence in patients undergoing R0 resection was significantly higher in the CT group compared to the CRT group (local: 30% versus 8%, respectively, P = 0.03; regional: 37% versus 8%, respectively, P = 0.002).

conclusionsUpfront CT was not superior to upfront CRT as induction therapy for T4b EC in terms of 2-year survival and was significantly inferior to upfront CRT in terms of local and regional control. REGISTRATION: The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37142731
PMCPMC10307786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.