Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142627›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The SciQA Scientific Question Answering Benchmark for Scholarly Knowledge.

Sören Auer, Dante A C Barone, Cassiano Bartz, Eduardo G Cortes, Mohamad Yaser Jaradeh, Oliver Karras, Manolis Koubarakis, Dmitry Mouromtsev, Dmitrii Pliukhin, Daniil Radyush and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sören AuerTIB-Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.
Dante A C BaroneInstitute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cassiano BartzInstitute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eduardo G CortesInstitute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Mohamad Yaser JaradehTIB-Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.
Oliver KarrasTIB-Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany. oliver.karras@tib.eu.
Manolis KoubarakisDepartment of Informatics and Telecommunications, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dmitry MouromtsevLaboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitrii PliukhinLaboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Daniil RadyushLaboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Ivan ShilinLaboratory of Information Science and Semantic Technologies, ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Markus StockerTIB-Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.
Eleni TsalapatiDepartment of Informatics and Telecommunications, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

European Research Council 819536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge graphs have gained increasing popularity in the last decade in science and technology. However, knowledge graphs are currently relatively simple to moderate semantic structures that are mainly a collection of factual statements. Question answering (QA) benchmarks and systems were so far mainly geared towards encyclopedic knowledge graphs such as DBpedia and Wikidata. We present SciQA a scientific QA benchmark for scholarly knowledge. The benchmark leverages the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) which includes almost 170,000 resources describing research contributions of almost 15,000 scholarly articles from 709 research fields. Following a bottom-up methodology, we first manually developed a set of 100 complex questions that can be answered using this knowledge graph. Furthermore, we devised eight question templates with which we automatically generated further 2465 questions, that can also be answered with the ORKG. The questions cover a range of research fields and question types and are translated into corresponding SPARQL queries over the ORKG. Based on two preliminary evaluations, we show that the resulting SciQA benchmark represents a challenging task for next-generation QA systems. This task is part of the open competitions at the 22nd International Semantic Web Conference 2023 as the Scholarly Question Answering over Linked Data (QALD) Challenge.

Identifiers

PMID37142627
PMCPMC10160120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.