Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142625›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Using single nucleotide polymorphism array for prenatal diagnosis in a large multicenter study in Southern China.

Meiying Cai, Na Lin, Nan Guo, Linjuan Su, Xiaoqing Wu, Xiaorui Xie, Ying Li, Shuqiong He, Xianguo Fu, Liangpu Xu and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meiying Cai *Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Na Lin *Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Nan GuoMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Linjuan SuMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaoqing WuMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaorui XieMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Ying LiMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Shuqiong HeMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
Xianguo FuDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis, Ningde Municipal Hospital, Ningde Normal University, Ningde, China. xgfu2010@163.com.
Liangpu XuMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China. xiliangpu@fjmu.edu.cn.
Hailong HuangMedical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China. huanghailong@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have evaluated the use of single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) in prenatal diagnostics, but very few have evaluated its application under different risk conditions. Here, SNP-array was used for the retrospective analysis of 8386 pregnancies and the cases were categorized into seven groups. Pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) were found in 699 (8.3%, 699/8386) cases. Among the seven different risk factor groups, the non-invasive prenatal testing-positive group had the highest pCNVs rate (35.3%), followed by the abnormal ultrasound structure group (12.8%), and then the chromosomal abnormalities in the couples group (9.5%). Notably the adverse pregnancy history group presented with the lowest pCNVs rate (2.8%). Further evaluation of the 1495 cases with ultrasound abnormalities revealed that the highest pCNV rates were recorded in those cases with multiple system structure abnormalities (22.6%), followed by the groups with skeletal system (11.6%) and urinary system abnormalities (11.2%). A total of 3424 fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers were classified as having one, two, or three ultrasonic soft markers. The different pCNV rates in the three groups were statistically significant. There was little correlation between pCNVs and a previous history of adverse pregnancy outcomes, suggesting that genetic screening under these conditions should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleDNA Copy Number VariationsChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID37142625
PMCPMC10160013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.