Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142591›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Privacy risks of whole-slide image sharing in digital pathology.

Petr Holub, Heimo Müller, Tomáš Bíl, Luca Pireddu, Markus Plass, Fabian Prasser, Irene Schlünder, Kurt Zatloukal, Rudolf Nenutil, Tomáš Brázdil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The evolving role of DICOM in digital pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Artificial Intelligence in Histopathology.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Petr HolubBBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria. petr.holub@bbmri-eric.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-616X
Heimo MüllerBBMRI.at & Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, A-8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9691-4872
Tomáš BílInstitute of Computer Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Luca PiredduVisual and Data-intensive Computing Group, CRS4, Pula, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4663-5613
Markus PlassBBMRI.at & Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, A-8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2718-7648
Fabian PrasserBerlin Institute of Health @ Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3172-3095
Irene SchlünderTMF eV, Berlin, Germany.
Kurt ZatloukalBBMRI.at & Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, A-8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5299-7218
Rudolf NenutilBBMRI.cz & Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomáš BrázdilFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZMedical University of Graz · ATBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECenter for Advanced Studies Research and Development in Sardinia · ITMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to large volumes of so-called whole-slide images-high-resolution scans of complete pathological slides-has become a cornerstone of the development of novel artificial intelligence methods in pathology for diagnostic use, education/training of pathologists, and research. Nevertheless, a methodology based on risk analysis for evaluating the privacy risks associated with sharing such imaging data and applying the principle "as open as possible and as closed as necessary" is still lacking. In this article, we develop a model for privacy risk analysis for whole-slide images which focuses primarily on identity disclosure attacks, as these are the most important from a regulatory perspective. We introduce a taxonomy of whole-slide images with respect to privacy risks and mathematical model for risk assessment and design . Based on this risk assessment model and the taxonomy, we conduct a series of experiments to demonstrate the risks using real-world imaging data. Finally, we develop guidelines for risk assessment and recommendations for low-risk sharing of whole-slide image data.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePrivacyDiagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID37142591
PMCPMC10160114
OpenAlexW4368364795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.