Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142464›Full record

ReviewAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Cutaneous metastases from solid neoplasms - Literature review.

Bruno de Castro E Souza, Denis Miyashiro, Marcella Soares Pincelli, José Antonio Sanches

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Atypical Cutaneous Metastasis in Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruno de Castro E SouzaDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: bruno.csouza@hc.fm.usp.br.
Denis MiyashiroDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcella Soares PincelliDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
José Antonio SanchesDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous metastases from solid tumors are uncommon events in clinical practice. Most of the time, the patient already has the diagnosis of a malignant neoplasm when the cutaneous metastasis is detected. However, in up to one-third of cases, cutaneous metastasis is identified before the primary tumor. Therefore, its identification may be essential for starting treatment, although it is usually indicative of poor prognosis. The diagnosis will depend on clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical analysis. Sometimes the identification of the primary site is difficult; however, a thorough analysis using imaging tests and constant surveillance is important.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryMedical oncologyNeoplastic metastasis

Identifiers

PMID37142464
PMCPMC10404505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.