Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142386›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2023

Medication-related problems in critical care survivors: a systematic review.

Abigail Short, Joanne McPeake, Mark Andonovic, Stuart McFee, Tara Quasim, Alastair Leyland, Martin Shaw, Theodore Iwashyna, Pamela MacTavish

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Challenge healthcare system: spotlight on PICS].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Abigail ShortNHS Forth Valley, Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Joanne McPeakeThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK joanne.mcpeake@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8206-6801
Mark AndonovicSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Stuart McFeeNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Tara QuasimSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alastair LeylandMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Martin ShawNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Theodore IwashynaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pamela MacTavishNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBInstitute for Healthcare Improvement · USJohns Hopkins University · USMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBNHS Forth Valley · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere are numerous, often single centre discussions of assorted medication-related problems after hospital discharge in patients who survive critical illness. However, there has been little synthesis of the incidence of medication-related problems, the classes of medications most often studied, the factors that are associated with greater patient risk of such problems or interventions that can prevent them.

methodsWe undertook a systematic review to understand medication management and medication problems in critical care survivors in the hospital discharge period. We searched OVID Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL and the Cochrane database (2001-2022). Two reviewers independently screened publications to identify studies that examined medication management at hospital discharge or thereafter in critical care survivors. We included randomised and non-randomised studies. We extracted data independently and in duplicate. Data extracted included medication type, medication-related problems and frequency of medication issues, alongside demographics such as study setting. Cohort study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottowa Score checklist. Data were analysed across medication categories.

resultsThe database search initially retrieved 1180 studies; following the removal of duplicates and studies which did not fit the inclusion criteria, 47 papers were included. The quality of studies included varied. The outcomes measured and the timepoints at which data were captured also varied, which impacted the quality of data synthesis. Across the studies included, we found that as many as 80% of critically ill patients experienced medication-related problems in the posthospital discharge period. These issues included inappropriate continuation of newly prescribed drugs such as antipsychotics, gastrointestinal prophylaxis and analgesic medications, as well as inappropriate discontinuation of chronic disease medications, such as secondary prevention cardiac drugs.

conclusionsFollowing critical illness, a high proportion of patients experience problems with their medications. These changes were present across multiple health systems. Further research is required to understand optimal medicine management across the full recovery trajectory of critical illness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021255975.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessCohort StudiesHumansPatient DischargeSurvivorsCLINICAL MEDICINECritical CareCRITICAL CAREPHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINEQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID37142386
PMCPMC10447966
OpenAlexW4368373943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.