Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37142312›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Prediction of medical sciences students' performance on high-stakes examinations using machine learning models: a protocol for a systematic review.

Haniye Mastour, Toktam Dehghani, Mahdie Jajroudi, Ehsan Moradi, Mitra Zarei, Saeid Eslami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haniye MastourDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-0998
Toktam DehghaniDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran dehghanit982@mums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-3931-2880
Mahdie JajroudiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4605-5221
Ehsan MoradiHead of Information Technology at vice president for Education, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2270-6963
Mitra ZareiFaculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8309-7052
Saeid EslamiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3755-1212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPredicting medical science students' performance on high-stakes examinations has received considerable attention. Machine learning (ML) models are well-known approaches to enhance the accuracy of determining the students' performance. Accordingly, we aim to provide a comprehensive framework and systematic review protocol for applying ML in predicting medical science students' performance on high-stakes examinations. Improving the current understanding of the input and output features, preprocessing methods, setting of ML models and required evaluation metrics seems essential. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted by searching the electronic bibliographic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science. The search will be limited to studies published from January 2013 to June 2023. Studies explicitly predicting student performance in high-stakes examinations and referencing their learning outcomes and use of ML models will be included. Two team members will first screen literature meeting the inclusion criteria at the title, abstract and full-text levels. Second, the Best Evidence Medical Education quality framework rates the included literature. Later, two team members will extract data, including the studies' general data and the ML approach's details. Finally, the information consensus will be reached and submitted for analysis. The synthesised evidence from this review provides helpful information for medical education policy-makers, stakeholders and other researchers in adopting the ML models to evaluate medical science students' performance in high-stakes exams. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review protocol summarises findings of existing publications rather than primary data and does not require an ethics review. The results will be disseminated in publications of peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalMedicineStudents, MedicalHumansPublicationsSystematic Reviews as Topiceducation & training (see medical education & training)general medicine (see Internal Medicine)health informaticsmedical education & training

Identifiers

PMID37142312
PMCPMC10163468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.