Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37141983›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

A Prospective Study of Radiation Therapy After Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Analysis of the Dosimetric Implications.

Daphna Y Spiegel, Julia Willcox, Rosie Friedman, Jacquelyn Kinney, Dhruv Singhal, Abram Recht

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction: Lessons learned over eight years.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daphna Y SpiegelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: dspiege1@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Julia WillcoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rosie FriedmanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jacquelyn KinneyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dhruv SinghalDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abram RechtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Structural and Functional Remodeling of the Lymphatic System After Axillary Lymph Node DissectionR01HL157991 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Dhruv Singhal · 2021 to 2026
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL157991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) are the primary causes of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is a novel surgical procedure that reduces the incidence of BCRL after ALND. The ILR anastomosis is placed in a location thought to be outside the standard radiation therapy fields to prevent radiation-induced fibrosis of the reconstructed vessels; however, there is excess risk of BCRL from RNI even after ILR. The purpose of this study was to understand the radiation dose distribution in relation to the ILR anastomosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective study included 13 patients treated with ALND/ILR from October 2020 to June 2022. A twirl clip deployed during surgery was used to identify the ILR anastomosis site during radiation treatment planning. All cases were planned using a 3D-conformal technique with opposed tangents and an obliqued supraclavicular (SCV) field.

resultsRNI deliberately targeted axillary Levels 1 to 3 and the SCV nodal region in 4 patients and was limited to Level 3 and SCV nodes in 9 patients. The ILR clip was located in Level 1 in 12 patients and Level 2 in 1 patient. In patients with radiation directed at only Level 3 and SCV, the ILR clip was still within the radiation field in 5 of these patients and received a median dose of 3939 cGy (range, 2025-4961 cGy). The median dose to the ILR clip was 3939 cGy (range, 139-4961 cGy) for the entire cohort. The median dose was 4275 cGy (range, 2025-4961 cGy) when the ILR clip was within any radiation field and 233 cGy (range, 139-280 cGy) when the clip was outside all fields.

conclusionThe ILR anastomosis was often directly irradiated with 3D-conformal techniques and received substantial radiation dose, even when the site was not deliberately targeted. Long-term analysis will help determine whether minimizing radiation dose to the anastomosis will decrease BCRL rates.

Indexed as

Breast Cancer LymphedemaLymph Node ExcisionAxillaHumansLymph NodesProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37141983
PMCPMC11613723
OpenAlexW4367679696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.