Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37141561›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2023

Training General Practitioners in Oncology: Lessons Learned From a Cross-Sectional Survey of GPOs in Canada.

Bishal Gyawali, Laura Mae Carson, Sian Shuel, Anna Nathalie Wilkinson, Heather Ostic, Colleen Savage, Scott Berry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  2. Advances in cancer therapy require urgent changes to the oncology workforce.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bishal GyawaliDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7444-8594
Laura Mae CarsonDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8425-1477
Sian ShuelPrimary Care Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Anna Nathalie WilkinsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5422-8428
Heather OsticDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Colleen SavageDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8107-7648
Scott BerryDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-7584
Queen's University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CABC Cancer Agency · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany countries face a significant shortage of medical oncologists. To mitigate this problem, some countries, including Canada, have established training programs for general practitioners in oncology (GPOs), which train family physicians (FPs) in the fundamentals of cancer care. This type of GPO training model may be useful in other countries facing similar challenges. Therefore, Canadian GPOs were surveyed to learn from their experiences and inform the development of similar programs in other countries.

methodsA survey was designed and administered to Canadian GPOs to understand the methods and outcomes of GPO training and practice in the Canadian context. The survey was active from July 2021 to April 2022. Participants were recruited through personal and provincial networks and an email list provided by the Canadian GPO network.

resultsThe survey received 37 responses for an estimated response rate of 18%. Although only 38% of respondents indicated that family medicine training sufficiently prepared them to care for patients with cancer, 90% indicated that GPO training did. Clinics with oncologists were found to be the most effective mode of learning, followed by small group learning and online education. Critical knowledge domains and skills most relevant for GPO training were identified as the treatment of side effects, symptom management, palliative care, and breaking bad news.

conclusionParticipants in this survey felt that a dedicated GPO training program offered value beyond family medicine residency in preparing providers to adequately care for patients with cancer. GPO training can be done effectively through virtual and hybrid content delivery. Critical knowledge domains and skills identified as the most important in this survey may be valuable for other groups and nations implementing similar training programs to increase their oncology workforce.

Indexed as

General PractitionersNeoplasmsCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMedical OncologySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37141561
PMCPMC10281329
OpenAlexW4368617921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.