Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37141389›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

An integrated model for predicting KRAS dependency.

Yihsuan S Tsai, Yogitha S Chareddy, Brandon A Price, Joel S Parker, Chad V Pecot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yihsuan S TsaiUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Yogitha S ChareddyUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Brandon A PriceUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Joel S ParkerUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Chad V PecotUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5250-2999
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Tumor Endothelial Cell Regulation of Pro-Metastatic Fibrin MatricesR01CA258451 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DUDLEY, ANDREW CARL, PECOT, CHAD V · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Immune Regulation of Lung Squamous MetastasisR01CA215075 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PECOT, CHAD V · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Enhancement Training for the Next Generation of Translational Ph.D. ScientistsT32GM122741 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WOLBERG, ALISA S., YEH, JEN JEN · 2018 to 2022
$898k
Development of EFTX-001 to target KRAS mutations in cancerR41CA246848 · NCI · ENFUEGO THERAPEUTICS INC. · PI PECOT, CHAD V · 2020 to 2020
$225k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215075NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258451NCI NIH HHS R41 CA246848NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM122741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical approvals of KRAS G12C inhibitors have been a revolutionary advance in precision oncology, but response rates are often modest. To improve patient selection, we developed an integrated model to predict KRAS dependency. By integrating molecular profiles of a large panel of cell lines from the DEMETER2 dataset, we built a binary classifier to predict a tumor's KRAS dependency. Monte Carlo cross validation via ElasticNet within the training set was used to compare model performance and to tune parameters α and λ. The final model was then applied to the validation set. We validated the model with genetic depletion assays and an external dataset of lung cancer cells treated with a G12C inhibitor. We then applied the model to several Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. The final "K20" model contains 20 features, including expression of 19 genes and KRAS mutation status. In the validation cohort, K20 had an AUC of 0.94 and accurately predicted KRAS dependency in both mutant and KRAS wild-type cell lines following genetic depletion. It was also highly predictive across an external dataset of lung cancer lines treated with KRAS G12C inhibition. When applied to TCGA datasets, specific subpopulations such as the invasive subtype in colorectal cancer and copy number high pancreatic adenocarcinoma were predicted to have higher KRAS dependency. The K20 model has simple yet robust predictive capabilities that may provide a useful tool to select patients with KRAS mutant tumors that are most likely to respond to direct KRAS inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaLung NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansMutationPrecision MedicineProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID37141389
PMCPMC10187917
OpenAlexW4368618195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.