Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37141331›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A pragmatic evaluation of university student experience of remote digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on lessons learned for future practice.

Menna Brown, Alice E Hoon, Maisie Edwards, Shawn Shabu, Imannuella Okoronkwo, Philip M Newton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-learning Challenges among Healthcare Students: A Scoping Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026
    Review
  2. The validity of unproctored online exams is undermined by cheating.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Menna BrownSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences. Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Alice E HoonSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences. Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-6156
Maisie EdwardsSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences. Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Shawn ShabuSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences. Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3086-6943
Imannuella OkoronkwoSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences. Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Philip M NewtonSwansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences. Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5272-7979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent national lockdowns resulted in drastic changes to the way that higher education was delivered. A mixed-methods research study was conducted to explore university students' perceptions of online learning during the 2020/21 academic year. Students from across all Welsh higher education institutions were invited to participate. First, a series of focus groups (n = 13) were conducted to explore students' experiences of online learning during the pandemic. Two were conducted in Welsh, the remaining eleven in English. Thematic analysis led researchers to develop eight key themes: Seeking the positives, Facilitators to learning, Barriers to learning, Lost sense of community, Let down by University, Workload, Assessment, and Health and well-being. These themes informed the design of a quantitative survey which was completed by 759 students. It was found that students were largely satisfied with the quality of online learning, however there were specific challenges associated with a lack of community, wellbeing concerns, and challenges with loneliness and isolation. Data from the focus groups and survey informed recommendations for practice in three key categories; teaching practice, institutional level recommendations, and student health and wellbeing considerations.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlHumansStudentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID37141331
PMCPMC10159348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.