Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37141140›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences2019

The Perceptual Contribution of Consonants and Vowels to Sentence Recognition: Effect of Dialect Variation in American English.

Daniel Fogerty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel FogertyDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina.

Funding

Maximizing speech recognition under adverse listening conditionsR01DC015465 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FOGERTY, DANIEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In background noise, the amplitude fluctuations of speech commonly provide for momentary glimpses of high intensity portions of speech, predominantly from vowels. Previous investigations have provided glimpses of consonants or vowels to determine the perceptual contribution of different speech acoustics to sentence intelligibility. The present study investigated the consistency of perceptual contributions across eight American English dialects for a group of listeners from the southern United States. Results demonstrated that sentences preserving predominant vowel acoustics were consistently more intelligible across dialects for all participants. The significant contribution of vowels does not appear dependent on familiarity with properties of dialectal variation but may represent the preservation of more general acoustic cues important for sentence recognition. Acoustic analyses of temporal amplitude modulation suggest important cues present during vowels and highlight gradient differences across dialects associated with intelligibility.

Indexed as

amplitude modulationdialectsentence intelligibilitytemporal envelopevowels

Identifiers

PMID37141140
PMCPMC10152988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.