Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37141035›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2024

Using mobile technology to influence alcohol-impaired driving risk perceptions and decisions.

Alison M Haney, Olivia M Warner, Sara D McMullin, Courtney A Motschman, Timothy J Trull, Denis M McCarthy

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of smartphone breathalyzer feedback on willingness to drive in moderately intoxicated individuals: A randomized trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Trial
  2. Associations between trait impulsivity facets and alcohol-impaired driving risk perceptions.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Unplanned drinking predicts alcohol-impaired driving cognitions and behavior in daily life.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alison M HaneyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-4593
Olivia M WarnerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-1022-7471
Sara D McMullinDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-0840
Courtney A MotschmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Timothy J TrullDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Denis M McCarthyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-5799-8057
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Psychology of Alcohol Use and Dependence TrainingT32AA013526 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DENIS M MCCARTHY, KENNETH JAMES SHER · 2002 to 2026
$9.0M
Risk for Alcohol Impaired Driving: From the Laboratory to the Natural EnvironmentR01AA019546 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MCCARTHY, DENIS M · 2010 to 2021
$4.3M
Mechanisms by Which Gender Norms Influence Drinking Behavior Among Minoritized PopulationsF31AA030210 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI WARNER, OLIVIA · 2022 to 2023
$92k
NIAAA NIH HHSNIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA030210NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA019546NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA013526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite significant individual and societal risk, alcohol-impaired driving (AID) remains prevalent in the United States. Our aim was to determine whether breathalyzer-cued warning messages administered via mobile devices in the natural drinking environment could influence real-world AID cognitions and behaviors.

methodOne hundred twenty young adults (53% women; mean age = 24.7) completed 6 weeks of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and provided breathalyzer samples using a BACtrack Mobile Pro linked to their mobile device. On mornings after drinking episodes, participants reported their driving activities from the previous evening (787 episodes). Participants were randomly assigned to receive warning messages if they reached a breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) ≥ .05, or no messages. Participants in the warnings condition reported their willingness to drive and perceived danger of driving at EMA prompts (1,541 reports).

resultsWe observed a significant effect of condition, such that the association between cumulative AID engagement and driving after reaching a BrAC of .05 was dampened among individuals in the warnings condition, compared to those in the no warnings condition. Receiving a warning message was associated with increased momentary perceived danger of driving and decreased willingness to drive.

conclusionsWe found that BrAC-cued warning messages reduced the probability of AID and willingness to drive while impaired, and increased the perceived danger of driving after drinking. These results serve as proof-of-concept for the use of mobile technology to deliver an adaptive just-in-time intervention to reduce the probability of AID. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingDriving Under the InfluenceAdultAlcohol DrinkingBreath TestsComputers, HandheldCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37141035
PMCPMC10624646
OpenAlexW4368361536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.