ArticleJAMA network open2023
Multicenter External Validation of the Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Index Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gynecologic imaging errors and pitfalls: how to avoid misdiagnosis on pelvic MRI.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of umbilical endometriosis: safety, feasibility, clinical, and imaging outcomes.European radiology · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of subtle MRI findings suggestive of minimal endometriosis: agreement, Kappa paradox, and interpretive variability.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Medical illustrations in radiologic reports for endometriosis: improving communication with surgeons and patients.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage IV endometriosis: A propensity score-matched analysis and review of the literature.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Mind the gap: underreporting of key compartments in endometriosis MRI with free-text and non-disease-specific templates.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Current Endometriosis Classifications (rASRM, #Enzian, AAGL2021) and their Correlation with Operative Time.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Urinary tract endometriosis: Revisiting the definition of ureterolysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Proposed new MRI scoring system of rectosigmoid endometriosis to guide operative planning.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: protocol, lexicon, and compartment-based analysis.European radiology · 2025Article
- ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: indications, reporting, and classifications.European radiology · 2025Article
- The Hôtel-Dieu MRI Classification of Uterosacral Ligament Involvement in Endometriosis: A Pictorial Guide to Clinical Use.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic MRI for deep pelvic endometriosis: towards a standardized protocol?European radiology · 2024Observational
- Concordance between Preoperative #ENZIANi Score and Postoperative #ENZIANs Score Classification-Why Do We Choose #ENZIAN and How Does It Impact the Future Classification Trend?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Reasons why it is time to change imaging guidelines on endometriosis.European radiology · 2024Article
- Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement†,‡.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus StatementHuman reproduction open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byBeyond the2024
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Preoperative mapping of deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE) is crucial as surgery can be complex and the quality of preoperative information is key. Objective: To evaluate the Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Index (dPEI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score in a multicenter cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, the surgical databases of 7 French referral centers were retrospectively queried for women who underwent surgery and preoperative MRI for DPE between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed in October 2022. Intervention: Magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed using a dedicated lexicon and classified according to the dPEI score. Main outcomes and measures: Operating time, hospital stay, Clavien-Dindo-graded postoperative complications, and presence of de novo voiding dysfunction. Results: The final cohort consisted of 605 women (mean age, 33.3; 95% CI, 32.7-33.8 years). A mild dPEI score was reported in 61.2% (370) of the women, moderate in 25.8% (156), and severe in 13.1% (79). Central endometriosis was described in 93.2% (564) of the women and lateral endometriosis in 31.2% (189). Lateral endometriosis was more frequent in severe (98.7%) vs moderate (48.7%) disease and in moderate vs mild (6.7%) disease according to the dPEI (P < .001). Median operating time (211 minutes) and hospital stay (6 days) were longer in severe DPE than in moderate DPE (operating time, 150 minutes; hospital stay 4 days; P < .001), and in moderate than in mild DPE (operating time; 110 minutes; hospital stay, 3 days; P < .001). Patients with severe disease were 3.6 times more likely to experience severe complications than patients with mild or moderate disease (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.4-8.9; P = .004). They were also more likely to experience postoperative voiding dysfunction (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.6; P = .001). Interobserver agreement between senior and junior readers was good (κ = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest the ability of the dPEI to predict operating time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and de novo postoperative voiding dysfunction in a multicenter cohort. The dPEI may help clinicians to better anticipate the extent of DPE and improve clinical management and patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.