ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
RGC-Net: An Automatic Reconstruction and Quantification Algorithm for Retinal Ganglion Cells Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Driven Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Murine Optic Nerve Myelinated Axons.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- AxoMetric platform facilitates rapid and unbiased automated quantification of axon regeneration in tissue sections.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning-based fully automated reconstruction and quantification algorithm which automatically delineates the neurites and somas of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Methods: We trained a deep learning-based multi-task image segmentation model, RGC-Net, that automatically segments the neurites and somas in RGC images. A total of 166 RGC scans with manual annotations from human experts were used to develop this model, whereas 132 scans were used for training, and the remaining 34 scans were reserved as testing data. Post-processing techniques removed speckles or dead cells in soma segmentation results to further improve the robustness of the model. Quantification analyses were also conducted to compare five different metrics obtained by our automated algorithm and manual annotations. Results: Quantitatively, our segmentation model achieves average foreground accuracy, background accuracy, overall accuracy, and dice similarity coefficient of 0.692, 0.999, 0.997, and 0.691 for the neurite segmentation task, and 0.865, 0.999, 0.997, and 0.850 for the soma segmentation task, respectively. Conclusions: The experimental results demonstrate that RGC-Net can accurately and reliably reconstruct neurites and somas in RGC images. We also demonstrate our algorithm is comparable to human manually curated annotations in quantification analyses. Translational Relevance: Our deep learning model provides a new tool that can trace and analyze the RGC neurites and somas efficiently and faster than manual analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.