Trial reportJAMA oncology2023
Bacterial Decolonization for Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Bacterial Decolonization to Prevent Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Quality of Life Assessment
Bacterial Decolonization to Prevent Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Quality of Life Assessment
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of prophylactic antibacterial agents for radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Practical recommendations for the management of radiodermatitis: on behalf of the ESTRO RTT committee.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Guideline
- Characterization of skin microbiome profile before and during radiation therapy and its correlation to the occurrence and severity of radiation dermatitis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- The microbiota-lymphocyte protective axis (MLPA): a novel paradigm for overcoming radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) and potentiating the efficacy of tumor immuno-combination therapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Review
- Article
- Systematic review of the tools and outcomes for the assessment of acute radiation dermatitis severity.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Skin Microbiome and Radiation-Induced Skin Injury: Unraveling the Relationship, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Research trends and hot spots in the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis: a bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis and visualization of research trends in radiation dermatitis in the past twenty years.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Do skin bacteriostatic agents reduce acute radiodermatitis in breast cancer patients? A prospective interventional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- "When Less is More": Paradigm Shifts in Radiation Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Evidence-based summary of the prevention and management of radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Review
- Identification of the skin microbiome as an emerging and modifiable risk factor for radiation dermatitis in breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- A topical BRAF inhibitor (LUT-014) for treatment of radiodermatitis among women with breast cancer.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Non-invasive physical plasma for preventing radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: Results from an intrapatient-randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Radiation-induced skin reactions: oxidative damage mechanism and antioxidant protection.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Radiation-induced skin injury in the head and neck region: pathogenesis, clinics, prevention, treatment considerations and proposal for management algorithm.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024Review
- Toward a Skin Dose-Area Metric Predictive of Moist Desquamation Using In Vivo Skin Dosimetry and Skin Assessments.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Physical Plasma for Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer: A First-In-Human Feasibility Study.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Evidence-based approaches for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) are limited, and additional strategies are necessary to optimize care. Objective: To determine the efficacy of bacterial decolonization (BD) to reduce ARD severity compared with standard of care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2/3 randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2019 to August 2021 with investigator blinding at an urban academic cancer center and enrolled patients with breast cancer or head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT) with curative intent. Analysis was performed on January 7, 2022. Interventions: Intranasal mupirocin ointment twice daily and chlorhexidine body cleanser once daily for 5 days prior to RT and repeated for 5 days every 2 weeks through RT. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome as planned prior to data collection was the development of grade 2 or higher ARD. Based on wide clinical variability of grade 2 ARD, this was refined to grade 2 ARD with moist desquamation (grade 2-MD). Results: Of 123 patients assessed for eligibility via convenience sampling, 3 were excluded, and 40 refused to participate, with 80 patients in our final volunteer sample. Of 77 patients with cancer (75 patients with breast cancer [97.4%] and 2 patients with head and neck cancer [2.6%]) who completed RT, 39 were randomly assigned BC, and 38 were randomly assigned standard of care; the mean (SD) age of the patients was 59.9 (11.9) years, and 75 (97.4%) were female. Most patients were Black (33.7% [n = 26]) or Hispanic (32.5% [n = 25]). Among patients with breast cancer and patients with head and neck cancer (N = 77), none of the 39 patients treated with BD and 9 of the 38 patients (23.7%) treated with standard of care developed ARD grade 2-MD or higher (P = .001). Similar results were observed among the 75 patients with breast cancer (ie, none treated with BD and 8 [21.6%] receiving standard of care developed ARD grade ≥2-MD; P = .002). The mean (SD) ARD grade was significantly lower for patients treated with BD (1.2 [0.7]) compared with patients receiving standard of care (1.6 [0.8]) (P = .02). Of the 39 patients randomly assigned to BD, 27 (69.2%) reported regimen adherence, and only 1 patient (2.5%) experienced an adverse event related to BD (ie, itch). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that BD is effective for ARD prophylaxis, specifically for patients with breast cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03883828.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.