ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2023
Tracheal sound-based apnea detection using hidden Markov model in sedated volunteers and post anesthesia care unit patients.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The current method of apnea detection based on tracheal sounds is limited in certain situations. In this work, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) algorithm based on segmentation is used to classify the respiratory and non-respiratory states of tracheal sounds, to achieve the purpose of apnea detection. Three groups of tracheal sounds were used, including two groups of data collected in the laboratory and a group of patient data in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). One was used for model training, and the others (laboratory test group and clinical test group) were used for testing and apnea detection. The trained HMMs were used to segment the tracheal sounds in laboratory test data and clinical test data. Apnea was detected according to the segmentation results and respiratory flow rate/pressure which was the reference signal in two test groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. For the laboratory test data, apnea detection sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.9%, 95.5%, and 95.7%, respectively. For the clinical test data, apnea detection sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.1%, 99.0% and 98.6%. Apnea detection based on tracheal sound using HMM is accurate and reliable for sedated volunteers and patients in PACU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.