Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37140851›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2023

Tracheal sound-based apnea detection using hidden Markov model in sedated volunteers and post anesthesia care unit patients.

Yang Liu, Erpeng Zhang, Xiuzhu Jia, Yanan Wu, Jing Liu, Lara M Brewer, Lu Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang Liu *Department of Stomatology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Erpeng Zhang *Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, No. 77, Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Xiuzhu JiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, No. 77, Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Yanan WuCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Lara M BrewerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Lu YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, No. 77, Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, People's Republic of China. lyu@cmu.edu.cn.
China Medical University · CNNortheastern University · CNUniversity of Utah · USWuhan University · CN

Funding

Education Department of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China No.LJKZ0788National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, China No.81401485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current method of apnea detection based on tracheal sounds is limited in certain situations. In this work, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) algorithm based on segmentation is used to classify the respiratory and non-respiratory states of tracheal sounds, to achieve the purpose of apnea detection. Three groups of tracheal sounds were used, including two groups of data collected in the laboratory and a group of patient data in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). One was used for model training, and the others (laboratory test group and clinical test group) were used for testing and apnea detection. The trained HMMs were used to segment the tracheal sounds in laboratory test data and clinical test data. Apnea was detected according to the segmentation results and respiratory flow rate/pressure which was the reference signal in two test groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. For the laboratory test data, apnea detection sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.9%, 95.5%, and 95.7%, respectively. For the clinical test data, apnea detection sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.1%, 99.0% and 98.6%. Apnea detection based on tracheal sound using HMM is accurate and reliable for sedated volunteers and patients in PACU.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaApneaRespiratory SoundsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsRespiratory RateAnesthesiaApnea detectionHidden Markov modelSedationTracheal sounds

Identifiers

PMID37140851
OpenAlexW4368358508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.