ArticleIrish journal of medical science2023
Comparing the Ipswich Touch Test (IpTT) and 10gm-SMWF (10-gm Semmes-Weinstein mono-filament) in Indian population subset with type 2 diabetes mellitus to detect diabetes neuropathy.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of occupational therapy on hand function in patients with systemic sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.Rheumatology international · 2025Trial
- Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability, Parallel Test Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Tuning Fork and Monofilament Tests.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic neuropathy diagnosis involves invasive procedures like nerve biopsy and nerve conduction studies which are seldom available at rural health centers. The Ipswich Touch Test (IpTT) is one test that can be performed by the caregiver and it's simple to perform.
aimThis study was aimed to compare the validity of the IpTT and 10gm-SMWF (10-gm Semmes-Weinstein mono-filament) test with the vibration perception threshold (VPT) using biothesiometer.
methodsTwo hundred patients with type 2 diabetes, between the age of 30 and 50 years, were included in the study. The neuropathy assessment was performed by biothesiometer, 10gm-SMWF test, and IpTT. Taking VPT(> 25 V) as the gold standard; the sensitivity and specificity of IpTT and 10gm-SMWF are calculated and compared to each other.
resultsOn comparing with the VPT, the 10gm-SMWF test had a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 85.7%, and the IpTT had a sensitivity of 91.9% and specificity of 85.7%. 10gm-SMWF test (Kappa value 0.733) had better agreement with VPT than IpTT (Kappa value 0.675). On Spearman's correlation, the 10gm-SMWF test and the IpTT had r values of 0.738 and 0.686 respectively (P = 0.000).
conclusion10gm-SMWFis a better test to diagnose neuropathy than the IpTT; but in the absence of 10gm-SMWFs, the IpTT is an ideal alternative. IpTT can be performed in a bedside or chairside setting in the absence of a professional health care provider who can screen patients for neuropathy and alert the physician of an impending complication where amputation can be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.