Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37140691›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2023

A biophysical and statistical modeling paradigm for connecting neural physiology and function.

Nathan G Glasgow, Yu Chen, Alon Korngreen, Robert E Kass, Nathan N Urban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan G Glasgow *Department of Neurobiology and Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yu Chen *Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alon KorngreenThe Leslie and Susan Gonda Interdisciplinary Brain Research Centre, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Robert E KassMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. kass@stat.cmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6680-4867
Nathan N UrbanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

Funding

Diversity supplement to Analysis of Nonstationary Point Process DataR01MH064537 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E · 2001 to 2024
$7.2M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCET90DA022762 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E, RUBIN, JONATHAN E. · 2006 to 2020
$2.0M
CRCNS: Analysis of Multi-Neuronal Data: Cortical Plasticity During LearningR01EB005847 · NIBIB · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E · 2005 to 2008
$1.2M
Mechanisms of biophysical diversity within and between olfactory bulb mitral and tufted cells.F32DC016775 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GLASGOW, NATHAN G · 2017 to 2019
$179k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005847NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA022762NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016775NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand single neuron computation, it is necessary to know how specific physiological parameters affect neural spiking patterns that emerge in response to specific stimuli. Here we present a computational pipeline combining biophysical and statistical models that provides a link between variation in functional ion channel expression and changes in single neuron stimulus encoding. More specifically, we create a mapping from biophysical model parameters to stimulus encoding statistical model parameters. Biophysical models provide mechanistic insight, whereas statistical models can identify associations between spiking patterns and the stimuli they encode. We used public biophysical models of two morphologically and functionally distinct projection neuron cell types: mitral cells (MCs) of the main olfactory bulb, and layer V cortical pyramidal cells (PCs). We first simulated sequences of action potentials according to certain stimuli while scaling individual ion channel conductances. We then fitted point process generalized linear models (PP-GLMs), and we constructed a mapping between the parameters in the two types of models. This framework lets us detect effects on stimulus encoding of changing an ion channel conductance. The computational pipeline combines models across scales and can be applied as a screen of channels, in any cell type of interest, to identify ways that channel properties influence single neuron computation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsAction PotentialsIon ChannelsLinear ModelsIon ChannelsCompartmental Hodgkin-Huxley modelPoint process GLMSingle neuron stimulus encoding

Identifiers

PMID37140691
PMCPMC10182162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.