Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37140641›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Incidences, causes and risk factors of unplanned reoperation within 30 days of craniovertebral junction surgery: a single-center experience.

Hu Chen, Peirong Lian, Qiang Tu, Jianhua Wang, Xiangyang Ma, Fuzhi Ai, Honglei Yi, Hong Xia, Changrong Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hu ChenThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peirong LianThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiang TuThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianhua WangThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangyang MaThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fuzhi AiDepartment of Orthopedic, SUN YAT-SEN Memorial Hospital, SUN YAT-SEN University, Guangzhou, China.
Honglei YiThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hong XiaThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. gzxiahong2@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3651-8410
Changrong ZhuThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 279716681@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the incidences, causes, and risk factors for unplanned reoperation within 30 days of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery.

methodsFrom January 2002 to December 2018, a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CVJ surgery at our institution was conducted. The demographics, history of the disease, medical diagnosis, approach and type of operation, surgery duration, blood loss, and complications were recorded. Patients were divided into the no-reoperation group and the unplanned reoperations group. Comparison between two groups in noted parameters was analyzed to identify the prevalence and risk factors of unplanned revision and a binary logistic regression was performed to confirm the risk factors.

resultsOf 2149 patients included, 34(1.58%) required unplanned reoperation after the initial surgery. The causes for unplanned reoperation contained wound infection, neurologic deficit, improper screw placement, internal fixation loosens, dysphagia, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and posterior fossa epidural hematomas. No statistical difference was found in demographics between two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of reoperation of OCF was significantly higher than that of posterior C1-2 fusion (P = 0.002). In terms of diagnosis, the reoperation rate of CVJ tumor patients was significantly higher than that of malformation patients, degenerative disease patients, trauma patients, and other patients (P = 0.043). The binary logistic regression confirmed that different disease, fusion segment (posterior) and surgery time were independent risk factors.

conclusionsThe unplanned reoperation rate of CVJ surgery was 1.58% and the major causes were implant-related failures and wound infection. Patients with posterior occipitocervical fusion or diagnosed with CVJ tumors had an increased risk of unplanned reoperation.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsWound InfectionHumansIncidencePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsComplicationsCraniovertebral junctionRisk factorUnplanned reoperation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.