Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37140596›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2023

Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach.

Stephen Adesope Adesina, Isaac Olusayo Amole, Oluwafemi Oyewole Oyewusi, Imri Goodness Adefokun, Ehimen Oluwadamilare Odekhiran, David Opeyemi Adeniji, Adepeju Olatayo Adegoke, Simeon Ayorinde Ojo, James Idowu Owolabi, Samuel Uwale Eyesan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen Adesope AdesinaBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. stephen.adesina@bowen.edu.ng.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5994-7686
Isaac Olusayo AmoleBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7845-8052
Oluwafemi Oyewole OyewusiBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Imri Goodness AdefokunBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Ehimen Oluwadamilare OdekhiranNational Orthopaedic Hospital, Igbobi, Lagos, Nigeria.
David Opeyemi AdenijiBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Adepeju Olatayo AdegokeBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-6314
Simeon Ayorinde OjoBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6759-0402
James Idowu OwolabiBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6355-0523
Samuel Uwale EyesanBowen University Teaching Hospital, P. O. Box 15, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-4598
Bowen University · NGBowen University Teaching Hospital · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the intraoperative procedural efficiency of antegrade and retrograde locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, power reaming devices and fracture tables.

methodsA secondary analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on 238 isolated diaphyseal femur fractures fixed with SIGN Standard and Fin nails within three weeks of injury. The data included baseline patient and fracture characteristics, nail type and diameter, fracture reduction methods, operative times and outcome measures.

resultsThere were 84 and 154 fractures in the antegrade and retrograde groups respectively. Both groups were similar vis-a-vis baseline patient and fracture characteristics. Closed reduction of the fractures was significantly easier for retrograde than an antegrade approach. The retrograde approach more readily permitted the use of Fin nails. The mean nail diameter used for retrograde was significantly larger than that for antegrade. The time taken to achieve retrograde nailing was significantly lesser than that of antegrade. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of the two groups.

conclusionIn the absence of expensive fracture-surgery gadgets, retrograde nailing offers many procedural advantages over antegrade, such as easier closed reduction and canal reaming, the greater possibility of using the Fin nail with fewer interlocking screws and shorter operative times. However, we acknowledge the lack of randomisation and the presence of an unequal number of fractures in the two groups as limitations of this study.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryBone NailsFemurFluoroscopyFracture HealingHumansTreatment OutcomeAntegradeFemur fracturesLocked intramedullary nailingLow- and middle-income countriesProcedural efficiencyRetrograde

Identifiers

PMID37140596
OpenAlexW4368362124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.