Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37140576›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2023

Intraoperative Fraction of Inspired Oxygen and Lung Injury in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Kaicheng Song, Sheng Wang, Jiange Han, Luyang Jiang, Junmei Xu, Ozan Akca, Kandis Adkins, Heidi M Koenig, Mark S Slaughter, Sean P Clifford and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaicheng SongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA;Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Sheng WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jiange HanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Luyang JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junmei XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ozan AkcaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Kandis AdkinsDepartment of Cardiovascular - Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Heidi M KoenigDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Mark S SlaughterDepartment of Cardiovascular - Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Sean P CliffordDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Yuguang HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China.
Jiapeng HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA;Department of Cardiovascular - Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA;Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA;The Center for Integrative Environmental Health Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA;Division of Infectious Diseases, Center of Excellence for Research in Infectious Diseases (CERID), Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
University of Louisville · USCentral South University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNPeking University · CNTianjin Chest Hospital · CN

Funding

University of Louisville Center for Integrative Environmental Health SciencesP30ES030283 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI J CHRISTOPHER STATES · 2020 to 2026
$10.0M
A Handheld Microchip for GC analysis of breath to screen for COVID-19U18TR003787 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FU, XIAO-AN, NANTZ, MICHAEL H · 2021 to 2022
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U18 TR003787NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePostoperative pulmonary complications are a series of disorders that can contribute to respiratory distress and prolonged mechanical ventilation postoperatively. We hypothesise that a liberal oxygenation strategy during cardiac surgery leads to a higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications than a restrictive oxygenation strategy.

methodsThis study is a prospective, observer-blinded, centrally randomised and controlled, international multicentre clinical trial.

resultsAfter obtaining a written informed consent, 200 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting will be enrolled and randomised to receive either restrictive or liberal oxygenation perioperatively. The liberal oxygenation group will receive 1.0 fraction of inspired oxygen throughout the intraoperative period, including during cardiopulmonary bypass. The restrictive oxygenation group will receive the lowest fraction of inspired oxygen required to maintain arterial partial pressure of oxygen between 100 and 150 mmHg during cardiopulmonary bypass and a pulse oximetry reading of 95% or greater intraoperatively, but no less than 0.3 and not higher than 0.80 (other than induction and when the oxygenation goals cannot be reached). When patients are transferred to the intensive care unit, all patients will receive an initial fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5, and then fraction of inspired oxygen will be titrated to maintain a pulse oximetry reading of 95% or greater until extubation. The lowest postoperative arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen within 48 hours of intensive care unit admission will be the primary outcome. Postoperative pulmonary complications, length of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and 7-day mortality after cardiac surgery will be analysed as secondary outcomes.

conclusionThis is one of the first randomised controlled observer-blinded trials that prospectively evaluates the influence of higher inspired oxygen fractions on early postoperative respiratory and oxygenation outcomes in cardiac surgery patients using cardiopulmonary bypass.

Identifiers

PMID37140576
PMCPMC10210611
OpenAlexW4367676423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.