Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37140476›Full record

Observational studyPhysical therapy2023

Measurement Properties of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in Rehabilitation for Patients With Stroke: A Prospective Observational Study.

Janne Evensen, Helene Lundgaard Soberg, Unni Sveen, Knut A Hestad, Jennifer L Moore, Berit Arnesveen Bronken

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Physical therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Janne EvensenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3433-8742
Helene Lundgaard SobergFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Unni SveenFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Knut A HestadDepartment of Mental Health and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health- and Social Sciences, The Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
Jennifer L MooreRegional Center of Knowledge Translation in Rehabilitation, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Oslo/Nesodden, Norway.
Berit Arnesveen BronkenDepartment of Mental Health and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health- and Social Sciences, The Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
Innlandet Hospital Trust · NOOslo University Hospital · NOSunnaas sykehus · NOUniversity of Inland Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated the validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in subacute stroke rehabilitation to determine its suitability to measure patient-identified rehabilitation goals.

methodsA prospective observational study was designed according to the checklist from Consensus-Based Standards for Selecting Health Measurement Instruments. Seventy-one patients diagnosed with stroke were recruited in the subacute phase from a rehabilitation unit in Norway. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health was used to assess the content validity. Assessment of construct validity was based on hypotheses for correlation of the PSFS and comparator measurements. We assessed reliability by calculating the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (3.1) and the standard error of measurement. The assessment of responsiveness was based on hypotheses for the correlation of change scores between the PSFS and the comparator measurements. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to assess responsiveness. The smallest detectable change and minimal important change were calculated.

resultsEighty percent of the PSFS items were classified as activities and participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, indicating satisfactory content validity. The reliability was satisfactory with an ICC of 0.81 (95% CI = 0.69-0.89). The standard error of measurement was 0.70 point, and the smallest detectable change was 1.94 points. Five of 7 hypotheses were confirmed for construct validity, and 5 of 6 were confirmed for responsiveness, indicating moderate construct validity and high responsiveness. Assessing responsiveness with a criterion approach resulted in an area under the curve of 0.74. A ceiling effect was identified for 25% of the participants 3 months after discharge. The minimal important change was estimated to be 1.58 points.

conclusionThis study demonstrates satisfactory measurement properties for the PSFS in individuals undergoing inpatient stroke rehabilitation. IMPACT: This study supports the use of the PSFS to document and monitor patient-identified rehabilitation goals in patients receiving subacute stroke rehabilitation when applied using a shared decision approach.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationDisability EvaluationHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsGoalsPatient-Reported Outcome MeasurePatient-Specific Functional ScaleRehabilitationShared Decision MakingStroke

Identifiers

PMID37140476
PMCPMC10158643
OpenAlexW4320490267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.