Observational studyCancer medicine2023
Fifteen-year survival and conditional survival of women with breast cancer in Osaka, Japan: A population-based study.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A scoping review of real-world data sources for retrospective oncology analysis in Japan.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Prevalence of Cancer Survivors in 2019 Among Patients Diagnosed Between 1975 and 2019: A Population-Based Study in Japan.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Occupational Disparities in Cancer Survival Among the Working Population in Japan: 10-Year Survival Analysis Using the Kanagawa Cancer Registry.Cancer medicine · 2025Observational
- Five-year conditional relative survival up to 10 years post-diagnosis among adolescent and young adult breast cancer patients by age, stage, and receptor subtype.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Article
- Temporal changes in regional variations in cancer survival rates in Osaka, Japan (1997-2015).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fifteen-year survival and conditional survival of women with breast cancer in Osaka, Japan: A population-based study.Cancer medicine · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the survival of patients with breast cancer has improved. However, few published studies have a longer than 10-year follow-up. Conditional relative survival (CRS), which is relative survival (RS) of patients who have survived beyond a certain period after diagnosis, is useful for assessing excess mortality among long-term survivors compared with the general population.
methodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort study. Population-based cancer registry data in Osaka, Japan were used to determine 15-year RS and 5-year CRS of women with breast cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2002 and followed up for at least 15 years. Fifteen-year RS and age-standardized RS (ASR) were calculated by Ederer II and cohort methods. Five-year CRS according to age group and extent of disease (localized, regional, and distant) was estimated for every year from diagnosis to 10 years.
resultsIn the cohort of 4006 patients, the ASR declined progressively, the 5-year ASR being 85.8%, 10-year ASR 77.3%, and 15-year ASR 71.6%. The overall 5-year CRS exceeded 90% at 5 years after diagnosis, reflecting a small excess mortality compared with the general population. The 5-year CRS of patients with regional and distant disease did not reach 90% within 10 years of follow-up (89.4% for regional and 72.9% for distant disease 10 years after diagnosis), indicating that these patients had substantial excess mortality.
conclusionLong-term survival data can help cancer survivors plan their lives and receive better medical care and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.