ArticleEssays in biochemistry2023
De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon?
Article in Essays in biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging innate and adaptive tumor immunity: cGAS-STING pathway activation to potentiate immune checkpoint blockade.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The introduction of immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibition, has revolutionised the treatment of a range of tumours; however, only a minority of patients respond to these therapies. Understanding the mechanisms by which different immune checkpoint inhibitors work will be critical for both predicting patients who will respond and to developing rational combination therapies to extend these benefits further. The initiation and maintenance of anti-tumour T cell responses is a complicated process split between both the tumour microenvironment and the tumour draining lymph node. As understanding of this process has increased, it has become apparent that immune checkpoint inhibitors can act both within the tumour and in the draining lymph node and that they can target both already activated T cells as well as stimulating the priming of novel T cell clones. Currently, it seems likely that immune checkpoint inhibition acts both within the tumour and in the tumour draining lymph node both reinvigorating existing clones and driving further de novo priming of novel clones. The relative contributions of these sites and targets may depend on the type of model being used and the timeline of the response. Shorter models emphasise the effect of reinvigoration in the absence of recruitment of new clones but studies spanning longer time periods examining T cell clones in patients demonstrate clonal replacement. Ultimately, further work is needed to determine which of the diverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are the fundamental drivers of anti-tumour responses in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.