Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37139679›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Patient and public co-creation of healthcare safety and healthcare system resilience: The case of COVID-19.

Abigail Albutt, Lauren Ramsey, Beth Fylan, Chloe Grindey, Isabel Hague, Jane K O'Hara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient and public co-creation of healthcare safety and healthcare system resilience: The case of COVID-19.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abigail AlbuttYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-7930
Lauren RamseyYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6518-9965
Beth FylanYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0599-4537
Chloe GrindeyYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK.
Isabel HagueYorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradford, UK.
Jane K O'HaraSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare system resilience is a conceptual approach that seeks to explore how health services adapt and respond to variability in demand and resources. As has been witnessed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare services have undergone many reconfigurations. One understudied aspect of how the 'system' is able to adapt and respond is the contribution of key stakeholders-patients and families, and in the context of the pandemic, the general public as a whole. This study aimed to understand what people were doing during the first wave of the pandemic to protect the safety of their health, and the health of others from COVID-19, and the resilience of the healthcare system.

methodsSocial media (Twitter) was used as a method of recruitment due to its ability for social reach. Twenty-one participants took part in 57 semistructured interviews over three time points from June to September 2020. The included an initial interview and invitation to two follow-up interviews after 3 and 6 weeks. Interviews were conducted virtually using Zoom-an encrypted secure video conferencing software. A reflexive thematic analysis approach to analysis was used.

resultsThree themes, each with its own subthemes were identified in the analysis: (1) A 'new safety normal'; (2) Existing vulnerabilities and heightened safety and (3) Are we all in this together?

conclusionThis study found that the public had a role in supporting the resilience of healthcare services and systems during the first wave of the pandemic by adapting their behaviour to protect themselves and others, and to avoid overwhelming the National Health Service. People who had existing vulnerabilities were more likely to experience safety gaps in their care, and be required to step in to support their safety, despite it being more difficult for them to do so. It may be that the most vulnerable were previously required to do this extra work to support the safety of their care and that the pandemic has just illuminated this issue. Future research should explore existing vulnerabilities and inequalities, and the heightened safety consequences created by the pandemic. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (NIHR Yorkshire and Humber PSTRC), Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Research Fellow and NIHR Yorkshire and Humber PSTRC Patient Involvement in Patient Safety theme lay leader are involved in the preparation of a lay version of the findings within this manuscript.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHealth FacilitiesHumansPatient ParticipationState MedicineCOVID-19 pandemicqualitative studyresilient healthcare theory

Identifiers

PMID37139679
PMCPMC10349237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.