Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37139516›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Design and evaluation of a rodent-specific focal transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with the custom shielding application in rats.

Li Liu, Ming Ding, Junfa Wu, Yuwen Zhang, Shaoqian Guo, Nianhong Wang, He Wang, Kewei Yu, Yuanfeng Weng, Lu Luo and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biomimetic materials for medical applications.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ming DingBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Junfa WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuwen ZhangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shaoqian GuoNanjing Vishee Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China.
Nianhong WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
He WangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kewei YuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuanfeng WengBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lu LuoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jingjun ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Quan ZhangNanjing Vishee Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China.
Kai QiuNanjing Vishee Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China.
Yi WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao XiaoBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qun ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive TMS has been used as an alternative treatment for various neurological disorders. However, most TMS mechanism studies in rodents have been based on the whole brain stimulation, the lack of rodent-specific focal TMS coils restricts the proper translation of human TMS protocols to animal models. In this study, we designed a new shielding device, which was made of high magnetic permeability material, to enhance the spatial focus of animal-use TMS coils. With the finite element method, we analyzed the electromagnetic field of the coil with and without the shielding device. Furthermore, to assess the shielding effect in rodents, we compared the c-fos expression, the ALFF and ReHo values in different groups following a 15 min 5 Hz rTMS paradigm. We found that a smaller focality with an identical core stimulation intensity was achieved in the shielding device. The 1 T magnetic field was reduced from 19.1 mm to 13 mm in diameter, and 7.5 to 5.6 mm in depth. However, the core magnetic field over 1.5 T was almost the same. Meanwhile, the area of electric field was reduced from 4.68 cm

Indexed as

electromagnetic shieldingfinite element methodfluorescence imagingfMRIhigh magnetic permeability materialrTMS

Identifiers

PMID37139516
PMCPMC10150080
OpenAlexW4366211349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.